Cases 11 - 20 of 20
Owner Operator Independent, et al v. Pennsylvania Turnpike, et al
as 19-1775
Plaintiff / Appellant:
OWNER OPERATOR INDEPENDENT DRIVERS ASSOCIATION INC, LAURENCE G. TARR, MULLIGAN TRUCKING INC and others
Defendant / Appellee:
JOHN N. WOZNIAK, in his individual capacity and his official capacity as Commissioner of hte PTC, MARK P. COMPTON, in his individual capacity and his official capacity as Chief Executive Officer of the PTC, PENNSYLVANIA TURNPIKE COMMISSION and others
USA v. Marcus Jone
as 17-2599
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
MARCUS JONES, a/k/a J-Rock
In re: Gary Rock
as 16-1863
Petitioner:
In re: GARY LEE ROCK
Respondent:
DISTRICT ATTORNEY FRANKLIN COUNTY
USA v. Franklin Thompson
as 15-3086
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
FRANKLIN THOMPSON, a/k/a Rock, a/k/a Hard Rock
USA v. Franklin Thompson
as 11-2761
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
FRANKLIN THOMPSON, a/k/a ROCK a/k/a HARD ROCK
USA v. Franklin Thompson
as 10-4022
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
FRANKLIN THOMPSON, AKA Rock, AKA Hard Rock
USA v. Gary Ramsey
as 10-2874
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
GARY RAMSEY, a/k/a "ROCK"
In Re:Huntington National Bank, et al
as 09-3958
Defendant - Petitioner:
In re: HUNTINGTON NATIONAL BANK
Plaintiff - Respondent:
MARTIK BROTHERS INC
Defendant:
KIEBLER SLIPPERY ROCK
Nominal Respondent:
ARTHUR J SCHWAB
USA v. Gary Ramsey
as 09-2760
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
GARY RAMSEY, a/k/a ROCK
In Re: WR Grace & Co, et al
as 08-1044
Debtor - Appellee:
In the Matter of: WR GRACE & CO
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MISSION TOWERS, AKA Foxridge Towers Ofc, BETHESDA REHAB HOSP, FIRST TN BANK, FKA Hamilton Natl Bank, FKA Natl Bank Bldg and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
