Cases 21 - 30 of 32
In re: Alton D. Brown
as 16-1546
Plaintiff - Petitioner:
In re: ALTON D. BROWN
Defendant - Respondent:
SHIRLEY SMEAL, DANIEL BURNS, TIMOTHY S. RINGLER and others
Defendant - Appellee:
ROBERT GILMORE and C.O. FRANK
Not Party - Nominal Respondent:
JAUN R. SANCHEZ
USA v. Blair Thomas, Jr.
as 16-1360
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
BLAIR THOMAS, JR.
In Re: Tormu Prall
as 14-2074
Petitioner:
TORMU E. PRALL
Respondent:
JOSEPH L. BOCCHINI, JR., ARTHUR R. SYPEK, JR., CHARLES ELLIS and others
Nominal Respondent:
JEROME B. SIMANDLE
USA v. Conrad Blair
as 12-4427
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
CONRAD CLINTON BLAIR
In re: Tormu Prall
as 11-4011
Plaintiff - Petitioner:
In re: TORMU E. PRALL
Defendant - Respondent:
JOSEPH L. BOCCHINI, JR., ARTHUR R. SYPEK, JR., CHARLES ELLIS and others
Not Party - Nominal Respondent:
JEROME B SIMANDLE
Douglas Gaer, et al v. Education Mgmt Corp, et al
as 11-3820
Plaintiff - Appellee:
DOUGLAS N. GAER, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated.
Plaintiff - Appellant:
OK POLICE PENSION & RETIREMENT SYSTEM and SOUTHEASTERN PA TRANS AUTHORITY
Defendant - Appellee:
EDUCATION MGMT CORP, TODD S. NELSON, EDWARD H. WEST and others
In re: Tormu Prall, et al
as 11-3640
Plaintiff - Petitioner:
In re: TORMU E. PRALL
Defendant - Respondent:
JOSEPH L. BOCCHINI, JR., ARTHUR R. SYPEK, JR., CHARLES ELLIS and others
Wells Fargo Bank NA v. 400 Blair Road Realty Holdings, et al
as 11-3143
Plaintiff - Appellee:
WELLS FARGO BANK NA, successor by merger to WELLS FARGO BANK MINNESOTA, N.A. as Trustee for the Registered Holders of Solomon Brothers Mortgage Securities VII, INC., Commercial Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates, Series 2000-C2 by and through its Special
Defendant - Appellant:
400 BLAIR ROAD REALTY HOLDINGS, LLC, LAWRENCE BERGER and 400 BLAIR REALTY HOLDINGS LLC
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
