Cases 31 - 40 of 47
Aaron McCoy v. Keenya Taylor, et al
as 19-2662
Plaintiff / Appellant:
AARON MCCOY
Defendant / Appellee:
DETECTIVE KEENYA TAYLOR, BADGE NUMBER 9193, PHILADELPHIA POLICE PERSONNEL, JOHN AND/OR JANE DOE (1-5) and DETECTIVE JOSEPH JENKINS, BADGE NUMBER 8074
Jane Doe, et al v. Janssen Therapeutics, et al
as 19-1376
Defendant / Appellee:
JANSSEN PRODUCTS LP
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JANE DOE and JOHN DOE
Defendant:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON and JANSSEN THERAPEUTICS
In re: Grand Jury
as 17-2675
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
JOHN DOE 1 and JANE DOE 2
Jane Doe v. ABC CORP., et al
as 17-1718
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JANE DOE, Ex rel.
Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
USA v. James Wegeler
as 17-1717
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellee:
JAMES WEGELER
Movant - Appellant:
JANE DOE
USA v. James Wegeler
as 17-8009
Plaintiff - Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Movant - Petitioner:
JANE DOE
In re: Claude-Hudson Albert
as 15-3763
Plaintiff - Petitioner:
In re: CLAUDE-HUDSON ALBERT
Defendant - Respondent:
SUNTRUST MORTGAGE INC, JULEE W. ANDREWS, CEO for Suntrust Mortgage Co. in her public and personal capacities, KALISHA JACKSON, Agent for Suntrust Mortgage Co. in her public and personal capacities and others
Nominal Respondent:
PETER G. SHERIDAN
In re: Alexander Brown
as 15-3710
Plaintiff - Petitioner:
In re: ALEXANDER BROWN
Defendant - Respondent:
CITY OF PHILADELPHIA, COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA, MOORE, Sgt. and others
Nominal Respondent:
JOEL H. SLOMSKY
Alton Brown, et al
as 15-3180
Petitioner:
In re: ALTON D. BROWN
Respondent:
DAVID DIGUGLIELMO, SCOTT WILLIAMSON, FELIPE ARIAS and others
Nominal Respondent:
ANITA B. BRODY
Whatley, et al v. Eastwick Education, et al
as 15-3019
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Ex Rel.
Plaintiff - Appellant:
SUEDA WHATLEY and JOHN AND JANE DOE, individually
Defendant - Appellee:
EASTWICK EDUCATION, THOMAS EASTWICK, EASTWICK COLLEGE and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
