Cases 41 - 50 of 97
Greg Johnson v. Darrell Wireman, et al
as 19-1968
Defendant / Appellee:
ULRICH KLEMM, DARRELL WIREMAN, SHAWN KEPHART and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
GREG JOHNSON
Angel Thomas, Sr., et al v. Tyree Blocker, et al
as 19-1774
Not Yet Classified:
MICHELE JAMES, KIM HAWN, PHILLIP CHAMBERLAIN and others
Plaintiff:
GLENN MORRIS and NORMAN E. GREGORY
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ANGEL LUIS THOMAS, SR.
Defendant / Appellee:
TYREE C. BLOCKER
Quintez Talley v. Timothy Mazzocca, et al
as 19-2309
Defendant:
THOMAS SUCHTA, DUSTIN POPE, DAVID LINK and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
QUINTEZ TALLEY
Kenneth Stafford v. Joseph Morris, et al
as 19-1924
Defendant / Appellee:
TROOPER DANIEL HARRIS, individually and in his official capacity as trooper for the State Police, TROOPER RONALD FLAGLEY, individually and in his official capacity as trooper for the State Police, TROOPER JOSEPH YURAN, individually and in his official capacity as trooper for the State Police and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
KENNETH STAFFORD
Hermione Winter v. Monica Mills, et al
as 19-1702
Defendant / Appellee:
SMANATHA GEORGE, C/O, COLLETTE, MA, MONICA MILLS, MA and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
HERMIONE KELLY IVY WINTER, formerly known as David Allen Allemandi
In re: Morris Willis
as 19-1386
Respondent:
DISTRICT ATTORNEY PHILADELPHIA
Petitioner:
In re: MORRIS WILLIS
USA v. Donnie Morris
as 19-1539
Defendant / Appellant:
DONNIE MORRIS
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Bill Williams v. City of Allentown, et al
as 19-1444
Defendant:
CITY OF ALLENTOWN, GLEN DORNEY and GAIL STRUSS
Plaintiff / Appellee:
BILL WILLIAMS
Defendant / Appellant:
KEITH MORRIS and ED PAWLOWSKI
In re: Dereyk Morri
as 17-3311
Petitioner:
In re: DEREYK MORRIS
Respondent:
DISTRICT ATTORNEY PHILADELPHIA
In re: Dereyk Morri
as 17-2086
Petitioner:
In re: DEREYK MORRIS
Respondent:
DISTRICT ATTORNEY PHILADELPHIA
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
