Cases 61 - 70 of 734
Eric Clarkson v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue
as 23-1060
Petitioner / Appellant:
ERIC D. CLARKSON
Respondent / Appellee:
COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE
Robert DentIn re: Robert Dent
as 22-3434
Petitioner:
In re: ROBERT WILSON DENT
Respondent:
TIMOTHY MORRIS, Police Officer, DARREN SMITH, YISLEIDY D. MINAYA-VARGAS, Reading Police Officer and others
Kai IngramIn re: Kai Ingram
as 22-3216
Petitioner:
In re: KAI D. INGRAM
Respondent:
B. RUDZIENSKI, MICHAEL ZAKEN, S. DAVIS and others
Frederick FosterIn re: Frederick Foster
as 22-3209
Petitioner:
In re: FREDERICK FOSTER
Respondent:
JOEL H. SLOMSKY, LANDON Y. JONES, III, WILLIAM M. MCSWAIN and others
USA v. Jeffrey Martin
as 22-3001
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
JEFFREY D. MARTIN
Antonello Boldrini v. Ktt, et al
as 22-8050
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ANTONELLO BOLDRINI
Defendant:
CHRIS HILL, U.S.M.2019-2022 personally and in his official capacity as USM Detective, ROBERT D. MARIANI, personally and in his official capacity as Judge, MALACHY E. MANNION, personally and in his official capacity of Judge and others
Ana Velasquez Vasquez, et al v. Attorney General United States of America
as 22-2869
Petitioner:
ANA PATRICIA VELASQUEZ VASQUEZ and J. D. M.V.
Respondent:
ATTORNEY GENERAL UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Keith KnightIn re: Keith Knight
as 22-2828
Petitioner:
In re: KEITH M. KNIGHT, a/k/a Moon Starcloud
Respondent:
JILL SPYKER, Deputy Superintendent, SGT. REIHART, Block Sergeant, JOHN PAPOTTO, Former Counselor and others
Tasai BettsIn re: Tasai Betts
as 22-2790
Petitioner:
In re: TASAI BETTS
Respondent:
D. VARNER, Chief Grievance Officer, KEVIN KAUFFMAN, Superintendent, J. MCCLOSKEY, C.O. III and others
In Re: Dennis Walls
as 22-2773
Petitioner:
DENNIS LEE WALLS
Respondent:
ATTORNEY GENERAL PENNSYLVANIA, COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA, CHAD WAKEFIELD and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
