Cases 1 - 10 of 254
Lucille Farrell-Scott, et al v. Committee of Managers of Llewellyn Park, et al
as 24-1965
Plaintiff:
LUCILLE FARRELL-SCOTT and SUNNE-RYSE SMITH
Defendant:
COMMITTEE OF MANAGERS OF LLEWELLYN PARK and TRUSTEES OF LLEWELLYN PARK
Sandra RumanekIn re: Sandra Rumanek
as 24-1634
Petitioner:
In re: SANDRA RUMANEK and DR. OLGA A. KATZ
Respondent:
INDEPENDENT SCHOOL MANAGEMENT INC, SHERRY R. FALLON, DAVID G. CULLEY and others
Kevin Minehan v. Eric McDowell, et al
as 24-1040
Plaintiff / Appellant:
KEVIN MINEHAN, Individually and derivatively on behalf of Christi Insurance Group, Inc.
Defendant / Appellee:
ERIC G. MCDOWELL, ANDREW T. LUNNEY and CHRISTI INSURANCE GROUP INC
Defendant:
MCFADDEN SCOTT INSURANCE LLC
In re: David Kauffman
as 23-3179
Petitioner:
In re: DAVID R. KAUFFMAN
Respondent:
BARRY SMITH, ERIC YOUNG, BORDAS and others
Kevin Minehan v. Eric McDowell, et al
as 23-2737
Plaintiff / Appellant:
KEVIN MINEHAN, Individually and derivatively on behalf of Christi Insurance Group, Inc.
Defendant / Appellee:
ERIC G. MCDOWELL, ANDREW T. LUNNEY, MCFADDEN SCOTT INSURANCE LLC and others
Sandra RumanekIn re: Sandra Rumanek
as 23-2724
Petitioner:
In re: SANDRA RUMANEK
Respondent:
BERNARD G. CONAWAY, INDEPENDENT SCHOOL MANAGEMENT INC, DAVID G. CULLEY and others
USA v. Adam Scott
as 23-2769
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
ADAM SCOTT
Geoffrey Scott v. Attorney General United States of America
as 23-2697
Petitioner:
GEOFFREY HOWARD CHRISTOPHER SCOTT
Respondent:
ATTORNEY GENERAL UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
David Jaroslawicz, et al v. M&T Bank Corp, et al
as 23-8038
Respondent:
BELINA FAMILY and JEFF KRUBLIT
Petitioner:
M&T BANK CORP, HUDSON CITY BANCORP INC, ROBERT G. WILMERS and others
USA v. Scott Stedeford
as 23-2593
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
SCOTT ANTHONY STEDEFORD
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
