Cases 51 - 60 of 88
Michael Canning v. USA
as 13-3210
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MICHAEL CANNING
Defendant - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, United States Postal Service Headquarters, US SYSTEMS PLUS and CINTAS CORP
Raphael Theokary v. USA
as 13-3143
Plaintiff - Appellant:
RAPHAEL THEOKARY
Defendant - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Toni Clark v. Wells Fargo Bank, et al
as 13-2816
Plaintiff - Appellant:
TONI CLARK
Defendant - Appellee:
WELLS FARGO BANK, UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and THE COMPTROLLER OF CURRENCY
Mathis McMickle a/k/a Mathis A v. USA
as 13-2051
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MATHIS MCMICKLE A/K/A MATHIS AVERY
Defendant - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Domenic Tricome v. William Nichola
as 13-1909
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DOMENIC TRICOME
Defendant - Appellee:
WILLIAM NICHOLAS, UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, PRESIDENT USA and others
Daniel Smith v. USA
as 13-1411
Plaintiff - Appellee:
DANIEL SMITH, personal representative for the estate of Mary Ann Smith
Defendant - Appellant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellee:
MOHAMMAD N. DOWLUT, MD, ROBERT SCOTT, MD, ANNASHAE CORP and others
Rasheena Phinisee, et al v. USA
as 12-4419
Plaintiff - Appellant:
RASHEENA PHINISEE, IN HER OWN RIGHT and A. P., A MINOR, BY AND THROUGH RASHEENA PHINISEE, PARENT AND NATURAL GUARDIAN
Defendant - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Frank Summers v. USA
as 12-3961
Plaintiff - Appellant:
FRANK SUMMERS and JOSELYN M. SUMMERS
Defendant - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
A.P., et al v. USA
as 12-3893
Plaintiff - Appellant:
RASHEENA PHINISEE, IN HER OWN RIGHT and A. P., A MINOR, BY AND THROUGH RASHEENA PHINISEE, PARENT AND NATURAL GUARDIAN
Defendant - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Robert Melber v. USA, et al
as 12-3271
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ROBERT MELBER
Defendant - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, SCOTT M. WALSMAN, M.D., JUNG S. LEE, M.D. and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
