Torts - Injury Cases filed in the U.S. Court of Appeals, Third Circuit
Rhonda Gorton v. Air & Liquid Systems Corp, et al
as 23-2204
Plaintiff / Appellant: RHONDA J. GORTON, Personal Representative of the Estate of Thomas D. Gorton II, and in her own right
Defendant / Appellee: AIR & LIQUID SYSTEMS CORP, As Successor-by-Merger to Buffalo Pumps, AMERICAN REFRACTORIES, TA East Penn Refractories, AO SMITH CORP and others
Defendant: FOSECO INC, GENERAL REFRACTORIES CO, GOODYEAR TIRE & RUBBER CO and others
Ronald Bilinski v. Wills Eye Hospital, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 16-4298
Plaintiff - Appellant: RONALD JOSEPH BILINSKI
Defendant - Appellee: WILLS EYE HOSPITAL, DONNA GAMBINO, Co-Ordinator of Surgery, DR. MICHAEL A. DELLAVECCHIA and others
Defendant - Numerous Parties See Appellee: MICHAEL ALLEN, General Legal Counsel & Chief Administrator, ROBERT S. BAILEY, JR., General Legal Counsel & Chief Administrator, JOSEPH P. BILSON, General Legal Counsel & Chief Administrator and others
Charles Novins v. Kevin Cannon, et al
as 12-1716
Plaintiff - Appellee: CHARLES NOVINS, Esq., P.C. and Charles Novins Personally
Defendant - Appellee: KEVIN A. CANNON, KEVIN MICHAEL FRIES, JIM KELSO and others
Defendant - Appellant: VINCENT LAMB
Third Party - Appellee: YVONNE S. OSTERWALD
Charles Novins v. Kevin Cannon, et al
as 12-1715
Plaintiff - Appellant: CHARLES NOVINS, Esq., P.C. and Charles Novins Personally
Defendant - Appellee: KEVIN A. CANNON, KEVIN MICHAEL FRIES, JIM KELSO and others
Third Party - Appellee: YVONNE S. OSTERWALD
Charles Novins v. Kevin Cannon, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 12-1545
Plaintiff - Appellee: CHARLES NOVINS, Esq., P.C. and Charles Novins Personally
Defendant - Appellee: KEVIN A. CANNON, KEVIN MICHAEL FRIES, JIM KELSO and others
Defendant - Appellant: CARL R. OSTERWALD
Not Party - Appellant: YVONNE S. OSTERWALD

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?