Cases 1 - 6 of 6
MRL Development I LLC, et al v. Whitecap Investment Corp, et al
as 15-1923
Plaintiff - Appellee:
MRL DEVELOPMENT I LLC and MICHAEL R. LUCHT
Defendant - Appellant:
WHITECAP INVESTMENT CORP, DBA Paradise Lumber
Defendant - Appellee:
GREAT SOUTHERN WOOD PRESERVING INC, PUTNAM LUMBER AND EXPORT CO and PUTNAM FAMILY PROPERTIES INC
MRL Development I LLC, et al v. Whitecap Investment Corp, et al
as 15-1922
Plaintiff - Appellee:
MRL DEVELOPMENT I LLC and MICHAEL R. LUCHT
Defendant - Appellee:
WHITECAP INVESTMENT CORP, DBA Paradise Lumber and GREAT SOUTHERN WOOD PRESERVING INC
Defendant - Appellant:
PUTNAM LUMBER AND EXPORT CO and PUTNAM FAMILY PROPERTIES INC
MRL Development I LLC, et al v. Whitecap Investment Corp, et al
as 15-1921
Plaintiff - Appellee:
MRL DEVELOPMENT I LLC and MICHAEL R. LUCHT
Defendant - Appellee:
WHITECAP INVESTMENT CORP, DBA Paradise Lumber, PUTNAM LUMBER AND EXPORT CO and PUTNAM FAMILY PROPERTIES INC
Defendant - Appellant:
GREAT SOUTHERN WOOD PRESERVING INC
MRL Development I, LLC, et al v. Whitecap Investment Corp, et al
as 14-4738
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MRL DEVELOPMENT I, LLC and MICHAEL R. LUCHT
Defendant - Appellee:
WHITECAP INVESTMENT CORP, DBA Paradise Lumber, GREAT SOUTHERN WOOD PRESERVING INC, PUTNAM LUMBER AND EXPORT CO and others
Jonathan Kohn v. McGuire Woods, et al
as 12-3028
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JONATHAN KOHN, Trustee
Defendant - Appellee:
MCGUIRE WOODS, HAYMOUNT LIMITED PARTNERSHIP, HAYMOUNT MEZZ and others
Marvin Simon, et al v. KPMG LLP, et al
as 08-3341
Plaintiff - Non-Participating:
ANDREW FINK, KIM FINK, FITZROY VENTURES LLC and others
Plaintiff - Appellant:
TUSHAR DAVE
Intervenor-Plaintiff - Non-Participating:
EDWARD ARNOLD, BCTS LLC, BECNEL FAMILY TRUST and others
Intervenor-Plaintiff:
WILLIAM EACHO and DONNA EACHO
Defendant - Appellee:
KPMG LLP
Defendant:
SIDLEY AUSTIN BROWN & WOOD LLP, formerly known as Brown & Wood, LLP and ROBERT L. HECHLER
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
