Cases filed in the U.S. Court of Appeals, Third Circuit
Cases 41 - 50 of 103
Keith Dougherty v. Carlisle Trans Products Inc We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 15-2902
Plaintiff - Appellant: KEITH DOUGHERTY, Assignee of Bill's Mechanical and Welding (Fictitious name) Sole Proprietor Larry Runk III
Defendant - Appellee: CARLISLE TRANSPORTATION PRODUCTS INC
Not Party - Appellant: LARRY RUNK, II
Linda Hammell v. Air and Liquid Systems Corp, et al
as 15-2643
Plaintiff - Appellant: LINDA HAMMELL, individually and as Executrix and Executrix ad Prosequendum of the Estate of Arthur Hammell
Defendant - Appellee: AIR AND LIQUID SYSTEMS CORP, as successor by merger to Buffalo Pump, Inc., ARVINMERITOR INC, FKA Arvin Industries Inc, individually and as successor by merger to Rockwell International, BORG WARNER MORSE TEC, FKA Borg Warner Inc and others
Linda Hammell v. Air and Liquid Systems Corp, et al
as 15-2643
Plaintiff / Appellant: LINDA HAMMELL, individually and as Executrix and Executrix ad Prosequendum of the Estate of Arthur Hammell
Defendant: CARRIER CORP, TODD SHIPYARDS, individually and for its Todd Combustion Division formerly known as American Standard, Inc., successor-ininterest to Kewanee Boiler Corp., EATON CORP, as successor-in-interest to Cutler-Hammer, Inc. agent ofn/k/a Eaton Electrical, Inc. and others
Defendant / Appellee: CBS CORP, a Delaware Corporation, f/k/a Viacom, Inc., individually and as successor by merger to CBS Corporation, a Pennsylvania Corporation, f/k/a Westinghouse Electric Corporation, CRANE CO, successor to Jenkins Valves, Inc. also known as Jenkins Bros., FOSTER WHEELER CORP and others
Bull International Inc v. MTD Consumer Group Inc We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 15-2438
Plaintiff - Appellant: BULL INTERNATIONAL INC
Defendant - Appellee: MTD CONSUMER GROUP INC, successor in interest to Cub Cadet Corporation, TDBA MTD Products Inc, MTD Consumer Group Inc, Cub Cadet Corp, Bolens, Columbia, Cub Cadet Commercial, Cub Cadet Yanmar, Farm King, Garden Way Inc, Gold Series, Gutbrod, Gutbrod Kehre
Daniel Marino v. Usher, et al
as 15-2359
Plaintiff - Appellant: DANIEL V. MARINO
Defendant - Appellee: USHER, a/k/a Usher Terry Raymond IV, TOMMY VAN DELL and IN2N ENTERTAINMENT GROUP LLC
Defendant: WILLIAM C. GUICE, DANTE E. BARTON and DESTRO MUSIC PRODUCTIONS INC
Imran Chaudhri, et al v. Osram Sylvania Inc, et al
as 15-1905
Plaintiff - Appellee: IMRAN CHAUDHRI, individually, and on behalf of all others similarly situated, DEIDRA ROSS, RICHARD SMITH and others
Defendant - Appellee: OSRAM SYLVANIA INC and OSRAM SYLVANIA PRODUCTS INC
Plaintiff - Appellant: CLARENCE MORRISON
Keith Dougherty v. Carlisle Transportation Produc, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 15-1123
Plaintiff - Appellant: KEITH DOUGHERTY, Assignee of Bill's Mechanical and Welding (Fictitious name) Sole Proprietor Larry Runk II)
Defendant - Appellee: CARLISLE TRANSPORTATION PRODUCTS INC
Daniel Marino, et al v. Usher, et al
as 14-4408
Plaintiff - Appellant: DANIEL V. MARINO
Defendant - Appellee: USHER, a/k/a Usher Terry Raymond IV, TOMMY VAN DELL and IN2N ENTERTAINMENT GROUP LLC
Defendant: WILLIAM C. GUICE, DANTE E. BARTON and DESTRO MUSIC PRODUCTIONS INC
Not Party - Appellant: FRANCIS MALOFIY
Luis Antonio Aguilar Marquinez, et al v. Dole Food Company Inc, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 14-4245
Plaintiff - Appellant: LUIS ANTONIO AGUILAR MARQUINEZ
Defendant - Appellee: DOLE FOOD COMPANY INC, DOLE FRESH FRUIT, STANDARD FRUIT COMPANY and others
Homax Products, Inc v. Old Magic Corp, et al
as 14-3786
Plaintiff - Appellant: HOMAX PRODUCTS INC, successor by merger to Magic American Products, Inc.
Defendant - Appellee: OLD MAGIC CORP, f/k/a Magic American Corporation, f/k/a Magic American Chemical Corporation, ALSCOTT LLC, f/k/a Scottal LLC, ACME PATENT CORP, f/k/a Pentagonal Holdings, Inc. and others

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?