Cases 1 - 10 of 17
Anastasios Smalis v. Home Depot USA Inc
as 24-1094
Plaintiff:
ANASTASIOS M. SMALIS
Defendant:
HOME DEPOT USA INC
Defendant / Appellee:
DIVERSIFIED MAINTENANCE SERVICES and DMC MANAGEMENT LLC
Sergei Kovalev v. Home Depot USA Inc, et al
as 23-1759
Plaintiff / Appellant:
SERGEI KOVALEV
Defendant / Appellee:
HOME DEPOT USA INC, HOME DEPOT INC, HOME DEPOT NO 4112 and others
Home Depot USA Inc v. Lafarge North America Inc
as 22-1122
Plaintiff / Appellant:
HOME DEPOT USA INC
Defendant / Appellee:
LAFARGE NORTH AMERICA INC
Home Depot USA Inc v. Lafarge North America Inc
as 21-8049
Petitioner:
HOME DEPOT USA INC
Respondent:
LAFARGE NORTH AMERICA INC
Michael Kirchhoefer v. Home Depot USA Inc
as 21-2545
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MICHAEL KIRCHHOEFER
Defendant / Appellee:
HOME DEPOT USA INC
Jaison Cianelli v. Nourison Industries Inc, et al
as 20-2910
Defendant / Appellee:
NOURISON INDUSTRIES INC, KOHLS CORP, QVC INC and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JAISON CIANELLI
Brenda Florio, et al v. Ryobi Technologies Inc, et al
as 20-2857
Defendant / Appellee:
TECHTRONIC INDUSTRIES NORTH AMERICA INC, HOME DEPOT, RYOBI TECHNOLOGIES INC and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
BRENDA FLORIO and THOMAS FLORIO, JR.
Charlene Dzielak, et al v. Whirlpool Corp, et al
as 20-2661
Defendant / Appellant:
WHIRLPOOL CORP
Defendant / Appellee:
FRYS ELECTRONICS INC, SEARS HOLDINGS, LOWES HOME CENTERS INC and others
Plaintiff / Appellee:
CHARLENE DZIELAK
Defendant:
APPLIANCE RECYCLING CENTERS OF AMERICA INC
Charlene Dzielak, et al v. Whirlpool Corp, et al
as 20-2551
Defendant / Appellee:
FRYS ELECTRONICS INC, SEARS HOLDINGS, WHIRLPOOL CORP and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
CHARLENE DZIELAK
Defendant:
APPLIANCE RECYCLING CENTERS OF AMERICA INC
Home Depot USA IncIn re: Home Depot USA Inc
as 20-2146
Respondent:
LAFARGE NORTH AMERICA INC and MICHAEL M. BAYLSON
Petitioner:
In re: HOME DEPOT USA INC
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
