Cases 1 - 7 of 7
DA Nolt Inc v. Philadelphia Municipal Authori, et al
as 22-1120
Plaintiff / Appellee:
DA NOLT INC
Defendant / Appellant:
PHILADELPHIA MUNICIPAL AUTHORITY and CITY OF PHILADELPHIA
DA Nolt Inc v. United Union of Roofers, Water, et al
as 15-3697
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DA NOLT INC
Defendant - Appellee:
UNITED UNION OF ROOFERS, WATERPROOFERS AND ALLIED WORKERS LOCAL 30, ROOFERS LOCAL 30 COMBINED HEALTH AND WEFARE FUND, ROOFERS LOCAL 30 COMBINED PENSION FUND and others
Debtor - Appellee:
ROOFING CONTRACTORS ASSOCIATION INDUSTRY FUND
In Re: Cigna Corp. Erisa Litig
as 12-4150
Plaintiff - Appellee:
KIM NOLTE, SHERRY LEWIS, THERESA MITCHELL and others
Defendant - Appellant:
CIGNA CORP and CIGNA INVESTMENT REVIEW GROUP
Defendant - Appellee:
H. EDWARD HANWAY and STEWART M. BELTZ
USA v. Mervin Zimmerman, et al
as 11-4604
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
MERVIN NOLT ZIMMERMAN, MILDRED ZIMMERMAN and M&M FAMILY TRUST
Roofers Local No. 30 Combined, et al v. D.A. Nolt Inc
as 10-3854
Plaintiff - Appellee:
ROOFERS LOCAL NO. 30 COMBINED PENSION FUND, BD TRUSTEES ROOFERS LOCAL NO. 30 COMBINED PENSION FUND and MICHAEL O'MALLEY, In His Fiduciary Capacity
Defendant - Appellant:
D.A. NOLT INC
Roofers Local No. 30 Combined, et al v. D.A. Nolt Inc
as 10-3753
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ROOFERS LOCAL NO. 30 COMBINED PENSION FUND, BD TRUSTEES ROOFERS LOCAL NO. 30 COMBINED PENSION FUND and MICHAEL O'MALLEY, In His Fiduciary Capacity
Defendant - Appellee:
D.A. NOLT INC
Local Union 30 United Union of, et al v. D. A. Nolt Inc
as 08-3691
Plaintiff - Appellee:
ROOFING CONTRACTORS ASSOC, LOCAL 30 APPRENTICESHIP FUND, LOCAL 30 COMBINED ANNUITY FUND and others
Plaintiff:
LOCAL 30 HOME ASSN FUND and MICHAEL MCCANN, as Business Manager, Local Union No. 30 and as Chairman, Board of Trustees of Funds
Defendant - Appellant:
DA NOLT INC
Third Party:
MCALESSE MCGOLDRICK SUSANIN & WIDMAN
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
