Cases 1 - 10 of 24
PPG Industries Inc v. Jiangsu Tie Mao Glass Co Ltd, et al
as 21-2288
Plaintiff / Appellee:
PPG INDUSTRIES INC, a Pennsylvania corporation
Defendant / Appellant:
JIANGSU TIE MAO GLASS CO LTD, a Chinese company, BENHUA WU, an individual and MEI ZHANG, an individual
Carol Knox v. PPG Industries Inc
as 19-3418
Defendant / Appellant:
PPG INDUSTRIES INC
Plaintiff / Appellee:
CAROL KNOX
Carol Knox v. PPG Industries Inc
as 19-3383
Defendant / Appellee:
PPG INDUSTRIES INC
Plaintiff / Appellant:
CAROL KNOX
County of Montgomery v. Atlantic Richfield Co, et al
as 19-2352
Defendant / Appellant:
PPG INDUSTRIES INC, SHERWIN WILLIAMS CO, NL INDUSTRIES INC and others
Plaintiff / Appellee:
COUNTY OF MONTGOMERY
County of Lehigh v. Atlantic Richfield Co, et al
as 19-2353
Defendant / Appellant:
PPG INDUSTRIES INC, SHERWIN WILLIAMS CO, NL INDUSTRIES INC and others
Plaintiff / Appellee:
COUNTY OF LEHIGH
PPG Industries Inc v. USA, et al
as 19-1165
Defendant / Appellee:
SECRETARY UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE, UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
PPG INDUSTRIES INC
Mattie Halley, et al v. Honeywell International Inc, et al
as 16-2712
Plaintiff - Appellee:
MATTIE HALLEY, SHEM ONDITI, LETICIA MALAVE and others
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MAUREEN CHANDRA
Defendant - Appellee:
HONEYWELL INTERNATIONAL INC and PPG INDUSTRIES INC
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 15-2954
Debtor - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 14-4329
Debtor:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
In Re: Asbesto Product, et al
as 14-1753
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MERLE D. WILSON
Defendant - Appellee:
ACANDS INC, DRESSER INDUSTRIES INC, GARLOCK INC and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
