Cases 1 - 6 of 6
Andre Howerton v. Steven Kandarian, et al
as 20-3365
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ANDRE L. HOWERTON
Defendant / Appellee:
VISA, The Corporation Visa and METLIFE, The Insurance Company
Defendant:
CONTESSA SEGURA, An Employee in Human Resource for Visa, SUPERVISOR DAVE, A Manager for Visa, STEVEN A. KANDARIAN, CEO of MetLife and others
Appellee:
LATIA MANIGAULT, MARC MCCOY and J. M.
Andre Howerton v. Steven Kandarian, et al
as 20-2559
Defendant / Appellee:
VISA, The Corporation Visa and METLIFE, The Insurance Company
Defendant:
CONTESSA SEGURA, STEVEN A. KANDARIAN, CEO of MetLife, ALFRED F. KELLY, JR., CEO of Visa and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ANDRE L. HOWERTON
Appellee:
LATIA MANIGAULT, MARC MCCOY and J. M.
Andre Howerton v. Steven Kandarian, et al
as 19-1674
Defendant / Appellee:
METLIFE, The Insurance Company and VISA, The Corporation Visa
Defendant:
ALFRED F. KELLY, JR., CEO of Visa, SUPERVISOR DAVE, A Manager for Visa, CONTESSA SEGURA, An Employee in Human Resource for Visa and others
Not Yet Classified:
LATIA MANIGAULT, A MINOR J. M. and MARC MCCOY
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ANDRE L. HOWERTON
Carol Wolf, et al v. Tico Travel, et al
as 12-1744
Plaintiff - Appellee:
CAROL A. WOLF, EDWARD WOLF, Individuyally, and as Administrator Ad Prosequendum of the Estate of Brian Wolf, deceased and KEVIN HOLMES
Defendant - Appellee:
TICO TRAVEL, BOB MARRIOTT'S FLY FISHING STORE, DBA Bob Marriott's Travel Center, CASA MAR FISHING CLUB S.A. and others
Defendant - Appellant:
PISCATORY, d/b/a BOB MARRIOT'S FLYFISHING STORE
Carol Wolf, et al v. Tico Travel, et al
as 12-1596
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CAROL A. WOLF, EDWARD WOLF, Individuyally, and as Administrator Ad Prosequendum of the Estate of Brian Wolf, deceased and KEVIN HOLMES
Defendant - Appellee:
TICO TRAVEL, BOB MARRIOTT'S FLY FISHING STORE, DBA Bob Marriott's Travel Center, CASA MAR FISHING CLUB S.A. and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
