Cases filed in the U.S. Court of Appeals, Third Circuit
USA v. Edwin H. Zimmerman, et al
as 22-2192
Plaintiff / Appellee: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant: EDWIN H. ZIMMERMAN, IN HIS PERSONAL CAPACITY AND AS TRUSTEE O THE SUNNY SIDE FAMILY TRUST, THE WEMER TRUST, AND THE HINKLEVILLE HOLDINGS TRUST and WILMER N. ZIMMERMAN
Defendant / Appellee: DOUG MCCONKEY, RUTH ANN BURKHOLDER, KEYSTONE CONCRETE PRODUCTS INC and others
Defendant: ESTHER ZIMMERMAN
USA v. Edwin H. Zimmerman, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 22-1730
Plaintiff / Appellee: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant: EDWIN H. ZIMMERMAN, IN HIS PERSONAL CAPACITY AND AS TRUSTEE O THE SUNNY SIDE FAMILY TRUST, THE WEMER TRUST, AND THE HINKLEVILLE HOLDINGS TRUST and WILMER N. ZIMMERMAN
Defendant / Appellee: ESTHER ZIMMERMAN, IN HER PERSONAL CAPACITY AND AS TRUSTEE OF THE SUNNY SIDE FAMILY TRUST, THE WEMER TRUST, AND THE HINKLEVILLE HOLDINGS TRUST, WEMER FAMILY TRUST, HINKLEVILLE HOLDINGS TRUST and others
Defendant: ERLA SEIBEL, RUTH ANN BURKHOLDER, PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE and others
In re: Armando Pon
as 14-4751
Defendant - Petitioner: In re: ARMANDO M. PONS, I
Plaintiff - Respondent: DEPARTMENT OF TREASURY INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE, VINCE DIMARCO, INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE and others
Nominal Respondent: CATHY SEIBEL
In re: Armando Pon
as 14-4636
Petitioner: In re: ARMANDO M. PONS, I
Respondent: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Nominal Respondent: CATHY SEIBEL
In Re: Armando Pon
as 14-3955
Defendant - Petitioner: In re: ARMANDO M. PONS, I
Plaintiff - Respondent: UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT, UNITED STATES ATTORNEY SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK, WARDEN METROPOLITAN CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION and others
Respondent: UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK and METROPOLITAN CORRECTIONAL CENTER
Plaintiff - Nominal Respondent: CATHY SEIBEL

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?