Cases 1 - 10 of 57
Teamsters Local Union No 107 v. Madison Concrete Construction
as 24-1172
Plaintiff:
TEAMSTERS LOCAL UNION NO 107
Defendant:
MADISON CONCRETE CONSTRUCTION
Defendant / Appellee:
ANTHONY SGRILLO
Teamsters Local Union No 355 v. Ensinger Penn Fibre Inc
as 24-1037
Plaintiff:
TEAMSTERS LOCAL UNION NO 355
Defendant:
ENSINGER PENN FIBRE INC
In re: In re: Sensipar Cinacalcet Hydrochloride Tablets
as 23-2213
Not Classified By Court:
In re: SENSIPAR CINACALCET HYDROCHLORIDE TABLETS ANTITRUST LITIGATION
Plaintiff / Appellee:
CESAR CASTILLO LLC, KPH HEALTHCARE SERVICES INC and TEAMSTERS WESTERN REGION & LOCAL 177 HEALTH CARE PLAN
Appellant:
TEVA PHARMACEUTICALS USA INC, WATSON LABORATORIES INC, ACTAVIS PHARMA INC and others
Appellee:
UFCW LOCAL 1500 WELFARE FUND, TEAMSTERS LOCAL 237 WELFARE FUND and TEAMSTERS LOCAL 237 RETIREES BENEFIT FUND
In re: Sensipar Cinacalcet Hydrochloride Tablets
as 23-2214
Not Classified By Court:
In re: SENSIPAR CINACALCET HYDROCHLORIDE TABLETS ANTITRUST LITIGATION
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UFCW LOCAL 1500 WELFARE FUND, CESAR CASTILLO LLC, KPH HEALTHCARE SERVICES INC and others
Appellant:
TEVA PHARMACEUTICALS USA INC, WATSON LABORATORIES INC, ACTAVIS PHARMA INC and others
Appellee:
TEAMSTERS LOCAL 237 WELFARE FUND and TEAMSTERS LOCAL 237 RETIREES BENEFIT FUND
In re: In re: Sensipar Cinacalcet Hydrochloride Tablets
as 23-2215
Not Classified By Court:
In re: SENSIPAR CINACALCET HYDROCHLORIDE TABLETS ANTITRUST LITIGATION
Plaintiff / Appellee:
CESAR CASTILLO LLC, KPH HEALTHCARE SERVICES INC and TEAMSTERS WESTERN REGION & LOCAL 177 HEALTH CARE PLAN
Appellant:
TEVA PHARMACEUTICALS USA INC, WATSON LABORATORIES INC, ACTAVIS PHARMA INC and others
Appellee:
UFCW LOCAL 1500 WELFARE FUND, TEAMSTERS LOCAL 237 WELFARE FUND and TEAMSTERS LOCAL 237 RETIREES BENEFIT FUND
In re: In re: Sensipar Cinacalcet Hydrochloride Tablets
as 23-2216
Not Classified By Court:
In re: SENSIPAR CINACALCET HYDROCHLORIDE TABLETS ANTITRUST LITIGATION
Plaintiff / Appellee:
CESAR CASTILLO LLC, KPH HEALTHCARE SERVICES INC and TEAMSTERS WESTERN REGION & LOCAL 177 HEALTH CARE PLAN
Appellant:
TEVA PHARMACEUTICALS USA INC, WATSON LABORATORIES INC, ACTAVIS PHARMA INC and others
Appellee:
UFCW LOCAL 1500 WELFARE FUND, TEAMSTERS LOCAL 237 WELFARE FUND and TEAMSTERS LOCAL 237 RETIREES BENEFIT FUND
In re: In re: Sensipar Cinacalcet Hydrochloride Tablets
as 23-2217
Not Classified By Court:
In re: SENSIPAR CINACALCET HYDROCHLORIDE TABLETS ANTITRUST LITIGATION
Plaintiff / Appellee:
CESAR CASTILLO LLC, KPH HEALTHCARE SERVICES INC and TEAMSTERS WESTERN REGION & LOCAL 177 HEALTH CARE PLAN
Appellant:
TEVA PHARMACEUTICALS USA INC, WATSON LABORATORIES INC, ACTAVIS PHARMA INC and others
Appellee:
UFCW LOCAL 1500 WELFARE FUND, TEAMSTERS LOCAL 237 WELFARE FUND and TEAMSTERS LOCAL 237 RETIREES BENEFIT FUND
Sensipar Cinacalcet Hydrochloride Tablets AntitrusIn re: Sensipar Cinacalcet Hydrochloride Tablets Antitrus
as 23-8020
Plaintiff:
In re: SENSIPAR CINACALCET HYDROCHLORIDE TABLETS ANTITRUST LITIGATION
Respondent:
CESAR CASTILLO LLC, KPH HEALTHCARE SERVICES INC, TEAMSTERS WESTERN REGION & LOCAL 177 HEALTH CARE PLAN and others
Petitioner:
AMGEN INC, TEVA PHARMACEUTICALS USA INC, WATSON LABORATORIES INC and others
Stonemor Inc v. International Brotherhood of Teamsters Local 469
as 23-1489
Plaintiff / Appellee:
STONEMOR INC
Defendant / Appellant:
INTERNATIONAL BROTHERHOOD OF TEAMSTERS LOCAL 469
Pittsburgh Mailers Union Local, et al v. PG Publishing Co
as 21-1249
Defendant / Appellee:
PG PUBLISHING CO, Inc. d/b/a Pittsburgh Post Gazette
Plaintiff / Appellant:
PRESSMEN PAPERHANDLER LOCAL UNION 24M 9N, a Subordinate Union of the Graphic Communication Conference/International Brotherhood of Teamsters (GCC/IBT), NEWSPAPER NEWSPRINT MAGAZINE & FILM DELIVERY DRIVERS HELPERS & HANDLERS LOCAL NO 211, PITTSBURGH TYPOGRAPHICAL UNION NO 7, a Subordinate Union of the Communication Workers of America AFL-CIO and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
