Cases 141 - 150 of 4,256
COBILICH v. DELACRUZ-LOPEZ et al
as 2:2023cv23085
Plaintiff:
CARLOS COBILICH
Defendant:
JORGE ARMANDO DELACRUZ-LOPEZ, SIBEL CARRIERS LLC, JOHN DOES 1-10 and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Tort/Motor Vehicle (P.I.)
A.J. WORLDWIDE SERVICES, INC. v. NAV LOGISTICS, INC.
as 2:2023cv22984
Plaintiff:
A.J. WORLDWIDE SERVICES, INC.
Defendant:
NAV LOGISTICS, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal- Tort/Motor Vehicle (
JUREK v. CESPEDES
as 3:2023cv23086
Plaintiff:
ROBERT JUREK
Defendant:
ANGEL CESPEDES
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Tort/Motor Vehicle (P.I.)
BROWN v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 2:2023cv22962
Plaintiff:
AVIS BROWN
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2671 Federal Tort Claims Act
SYLLA et al v. SHAIKH
as 1:2023cv22754
Plaintiff:
SIRA SYLLA and HEAVEN SIMMON
Defendant:
MOHAMMAD SHAIKH
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391 Personal Injury
WALKER v. ZEMMAM et al
as 3:2024cv00378
Plaintiff:
THOMAS WALKER
Defendant:
SARAH ZEMMAM, VELSON ISLES and TURO, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391 Personal Injury
HUANG v. GEICO
as 2:2024cv00398
Plaintiff:
TENGYU HUANG
Defendant:
GEICO and GEICO A/K/A GOVERNMENT EMPLOYEES INSURANCE COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Personal Injury
JEONG v. GEICO
as 2:2024cv00365
Plaintiff:
YASOL JEONG
Defendant:
GEICO
Cause Of Action: 23 U.S.C. § 134 P.I.- Auto Negligence
POLANCO ALMONTE v. THE NEW JERSEY TURNPIKE AUTHORITY, GARDEN STATE PARKWAY et al
as 2:2023cv22642
Plaintiff:
Denier Polanco Almonte
Defendant:
THE NEW JERSEY TURNPIKE AUTHORITY, GARDEN STATE PARKWAY, THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY, THE NEW JERSEY DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Tort/Non-Motor Vehicle
WALKER v. WELCH
as 3:2023cv22742
Plaintiff:
Ms PAMELA J WALKER and PAMELA J WALKER
Defendant:
MR JOEL T WELCH and JOEL T WELCH
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Auto Negligence
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
