Cases 131 - 140 of 200
TEXAS EASTERN TRANSMISSION, LP v. 1.7 ACRES OF LAND MORE OR LESS LOCATED IN THE CITY OF CHESTER, DELAWARE COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA, R/W TRACT NO. 91, OWNER CITY OF CHESTER, PENNSYLVANIA et al
as 2:2012cv02614
Plaintiff:
TEXAS EASTERN TRANSMISSION, LP
Defendant:
1.7 ACRES OF LAND MORE OR LESS LOCATED IN THE CITY OF CHESTER, DELAWARE COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA, R/W TRACT NO. 91, OWNER CITY OF CHESTER, PENNSYLVANIA and UNKNOWN PERSONS AND INTERESTED PARTIES
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 717
LIBERIS v. CITY OF READING
as 5:2012cv02274
Plaintiff:
GESLIN LIBERIS
Defendant:
CITY OF READING
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. RODRIGUEZ
as 2:2012cv00840
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
ADORIS Z. RODRIGUEZ
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1471
DERHAMMER v. PA STEAKHOUSE, LLC
as 5:2012cv00141
Plaintiff:
JOEL DERHAMMER
Defendant:
PA STEAKHOUSE, LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
LATIMORE et al v. REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY OF THE CITY OF PHILADELPHIA
as 2:2011cv05917
Plaintiff:
ROBERT LATIMORE and BARBARA LATIMORE
Defendant:
REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY OF THE CITY OF PHILADELPHIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
JOHNSON v. ARMSTRONG WORLD INDUSTRIES, INC et al
as 2:2009cv70056
Plaintiff:
RONALD W JOHNSON
Defendant:
ARMSTRONG WORLD INDUSTRIES, INC, ACANDS, INC, ACANDS, INC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
TRANSCONTINENTAL GAS PIPE LINE COMPANY, LLC v. A PERMANENT EASEMENT FOR 0.055 ACRES LAND IN WEST WHITELAND TOWNSHIP, CHESTER COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA, TAX PARCEL NO. 41-04-0021.03C et al
as 2:2009cv01386
Plaintiff:
TRANSCONTINENTAL GAS PIPE LINE COMPANY, LLC, TRANSCONTINENTAL GAS PIPE LINE COMPANY, LLC, TRANSCONTINENTAL GAS PIPE LINE COMPANY, LLC and others
Defendant:
A PERMANENT EASEMENT FOR 0.055 ACRES LAND IN WEST WHITELAND TOWNSHIP, CHESTER COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA, TAX PARCEL NO. 41-04-0021.03C, THOMAS J. BURKE, SOVEREIGN BANK and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
TRANSCONTINENTAL GAS PIPE LINE COMPANY, LLC v. A PERMANENT EASEMENT FOR 0.203 ACRES AND TEMPORARY EASEMENTS FOR 0.797 ACRES OF LAND IN EAST BRANDYWINE TOWNSHIP, CHESTER COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA, TAX PARCEL NO. 30-06-0078 et al
as 2:2009cv01397
Plaintiff:
TRANSCONTINENTAL GAS PIPE LINE COMPANY, LLC, TRANSCONTINENTAL GAS PIPE LINE COMPANY, LLC, TRANSCONTINENTAL GAS PIPE LINE COMPANY, LLC and others
Defendant:
A PERMANENT EASEMENT FOR 0.203 ACRES AND TEMPORARY EASEMENTS FOR 0.797 ACRES OF LAND IN EAST BRANDYWINE TOWNSHIP, CHESTER COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA, TAX PARCEL NO. 30-06-0078, WILLIAM F. MCQUEEN, CORESTATES BANK and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
TRANSCONTINENTAL GAS PIPE LINE COMPANY, LLC v. A PERMANENT EASEMENT FOR 0.426 ACRES AND TEMPORARY EASEMENTS FOR 0.882 ACRES OF LAND IN EAST CALN TOWNSHIP, CHESTER COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA, TAX PARCEL NOS. 40-01-0003 AND 40-01-0007.4 et al
as 2:2009cv01396
Plaintiff:
TRANSCONTINENTAL GAS PIPE LINE COMPANY, LLC, TRANSCONTINENTAL GAS PIPE LINE COMPANY, LLC, TRANSCONTINENTAL GAS PIPE LINE COMPANY, LLC and others
Defendant:
A PERMANENT EASEMENT FOR 0.426 ACRES AND TEMPORARY EASEMENTS FOR 0.882 ACRES OF LAND IN EAST CALN TOWNSHIP, CHESTER COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA, TAX PARCEL NOS. 40-01-0003 AND 40-01-0007.4, EDWARD E. KIRKBRIDE, CAROLE H. KIRKBRIDE and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
TRANSCONTINENTAL GAS PIPE LINE COMPANY, LLC v. A PERMANENT EASEMENT FOR 0.099 ACRES AND A TEMPORARY EASEMENT FOR 0.015 ACRES OF LAND IN EAST CALN TOWNSHIP, CHESTER COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA, TAX PARCEL NO. 40-01-0006.030 et al
as 2:2009cv01402
Plaintiff:
TRANSCONTINENTAL GAS PIPE LINE COMPANY, LLC, TRANSCONTINENTAL GAS PIPE LINE COMPANY, LLC, TRANSCONTINENTAL GAS PIPE LINE COMPANY, LLC and others
Defendant:
A PERMANENT EASEMENT FOR 0.099 ACRES AND A TEMPORARY EASEMENT FOR 0.015 ACRES OF LAND IN EAST CALN TOWNSHIP, CHESTER COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA, TAX PARCEL NO. 40-01-0006.030, DONALD A. WILSON and LYNETTE A. WILSON
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
