Motor Vehicle Cases filed in the US District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania
Cases 71 - 80 of 115
FREEDMAN et al v. FRESSES et al
as 2:2014cv02068
Plaintiff: ANNA FREEDMAN and ROBERT FREEDMAN
Defendant: KATHLEEN D. FRESSES and ROBERTO FRESSES
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
GRIFFIN v. SOUTHEASTERN PENNSYLVANIA TRANSPORTATION AUTHORITY et al
as 2:2014cv01801
Plaintiff: RONALD D. GRIFFIN
Defendant: SOUTHEASTERN PENNSYLVANIA TRANSPORTATION AUTHORITY and THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
MILLER et al v. TWISS TRANSPORTATION, INC. et al
as 2:2014cv01782
Plaintiff: TERRENCE D. MILLER and MARGARET MILLER
Defendant: TWISS TRANSPORTATION, INC. , TWISS TRANSPORT, INC. , TWISS LOGISTICS, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
D'AMICO v. MCDANIEL
as 2:2014cv01313
Plaintiff: MARIE D'AMICO
Defendant: SARAH MCDANIEL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
SUREN-BROWN et al v. PARKER
as 2:2014cv00534
Plaintiff: MARITZA SUREN-BROWN and ROBERT BROWN
Defendant: SAM D. PARKER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
BUCHHARDT v. SMITH et al
as 2:2013cv07586
Plaintiff: JEAN BUCHHARDT
Defendant: PETE D. SMITH and TEXAS CES, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
BRAY v. SUMMERS et al
as 2:2013cv06553
Plaintiff: JOSHUA BRAY
Defendant: WILLIAM D. SUMMERS, JR. and SEARS ROEBUCK & CO.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
BURKHOLDER et al v. TUTTLE
as 5:2013cv06375
Plaintiff: DIEDRE D. BURKHOLDER and ROBERT J. BURKHOLDER
Defendant: CURTIS TUTTLE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
MCELROY et al v. BROWN et al
as 5:2013cv06216
Plaintiff: MARK E. MCELROY , GARY E. MCELROY, SR. , JEANIE D. KEEFER and others
Defendant: THOMAS V. BROWN and BRIAN M. HILL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
KOLACEK v. LUNG et al
as 5:2013cv04283
Plaintiff: RAYMOND R. KOLACEK
Defendant: PHILIP D. LUNG and EASTERN FREIGHT WAYS, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Tort/Motor Vehicle (P.I.)

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?