Cases 31 - 40 of 54
GASSNER v. NORFOLK SOUTHERN RAILWAY COMPANY
as 2:2009cv64588
Plaintiff:
WALTER L. GASSNER, JR.
Defendant:
NORFOLK SOUTHERN RAILWAY COMPANY
Cause Of Action: Diversity
GASSNER v. NORFOLK SOUTHERN RAILWAY COMPANY
as 2:2008cv89240
Plaintiff:
WALTER L. GASSNER, JR.
Defendant:
NORFOLK SOUTHERN RAILWAY COMPANY and NORFOLK SOUTHERN RAILWAY COMPANY
Cause Of Action: Diversity
SPENCER v. NORFOLK SOUTHERN RAILWAY COMPANY
as 2:2008cv89342
Plaintiff:
EARL W. SPENCER
Defendant:
NORFOLK SOUTHERN RAILWAY COMPANY
Cause Of Action: Diversity
DEVAULT v. NORFOLK SOUTHERN RAILWAY COMPANY
as 2:2008cv89558
Plaintiff:
KENNETH L. DEVAULT
Defendant:
NORFOLK SOUTHERN RAILWAY COMPANY and NORFOLK SOUTHERN RAILWAY COMPANY
Cause Of Action: Diversity
BENSON v. NORFOLK SOUTHERN RAILWAY COMPANY
as 2:2008cv85541
Plaintiff:
CORNELIUS BENSON
Defendant:
NORFOLK SOUTHERN RAILWAY COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
CORDELL v. NORFOLK SOUTHERN RAILWAY COMPANY
as 2:2008cv73912
Plaintiff:
BILLY G. CORDELL
Defendant:
NORFOLK SOUTHERN RAILWAY COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
GRIFFIN v. NORFOLK SOUTHERN RAILWAY COMPANY
as 2:2007cv73838
Plaintiff:
FRANK GRIFFIN and CARL S WESSON
Defendant:
NORFOLK SOUTHERN RAILWAY COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
CARPENTER v. NORFOLK SOUTHERN RAILWAY COMPANY
as 2:2007cv73833
Plaintiff:
MALCOM CARPENTER
Defendant:
NORFOLK SOUTHERN RAILWAY COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
ADAMS et al v. NORFOLK SOUTHERN RAILWAY COMPANY
as 2:2007cv73775
Plaintiff:
B R ADAMS and EDWARD GARVIN
Defendant:
NORFOLK SOUTHERN RAILWAY COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
CROW v. NORFOLK SOUTHERN RAILWAY COMPANY
as 2:2007cv73834
Plaintiff:
BOBBY R CROW
Defendant:
NORFOLK SOUTHERN RAILWAY COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
