Cases 81 - 90 of 756
GOK v. POST & SCHELL PC et al
as 2:2020cv04968
Defendant:
JUSTIN SWIDLER, DEREK SMITH LAW GROUP, PLLC, MATTHEW WEISBERG and others
Plaintiff:
HAYRIYE BERIL GOK
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
POWELL, SR. v. KONINKLIJKE PHILIS N.V.
as 2:2021cv03412
Plaintiff:
David Powell, Sr.
Defendant:
Koninklijke Philips N.V. a/k/a Royal Philips, Philips North America LLC a/k/a Philips NA, Philips RS North America LLC a/k/a Philips RS and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
PEARCE et al v. CESSNA FINANCE CORPORATION
as 2:2021cv02874
Plaintiff:
GARY L. PEARCE and PEARCE ENTERPRISES LLC
Defendant:
CESSNA FINANCE CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
TEST DOE v. ABC CORPORATION
as 2:2021cv99999
Plaintiff:
JOHN DOE
Defendant:
ABC CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
IN RE WAWA, INC. DATA SECURITY LITIGATION
as 2:2019cv06019
Defendant:
WAWA, INC.
Plaintiff:
NICHOLAS RAPAK, SCOTT PECK, Mrs. Tabitha Hans-Arroyo and others
In Re:
WAWA, INC. DATA SECURITY LITIGATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
HOLFORD v. DIFABIO et al
as 2:2021cv02261
Plaintiff:
BROOKE E. HOLFORD
Defendant:
LORI DIFABIO, LORI A. DIFABIO, DANIEL C. DIAZ and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Randall et al v. CESCAPHE LIMITED, L.L.C.
as 2:2021cv02806
Defendant:
CESCAPHE LIMITED, L.L.C., CESCAPHE LIMITED, L.L.C. doing business as CESCAPHE EVENT GROUP and Joseph Volpe
Plaintiff:
Michael Randall, Molly Randall, Maggie Vargas and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
SAYERS et al v. ARTSANA USA, INC.
as 5:2021cv01876
Plaintiff:
KIMBERLY MULLINS, MASHAYLIA SAYERS, BRITTNEY TINKER and others
Defendant:
ARTSANA USA, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
BOSKIE v. DREXEL UNIVERSITY
as 2:2021cv00592
Plaintiff:
JOHN EDWARD BOSKIE, JR.
Defendant:
DREXEL UNIVERSITY doing business as DREXEL MEDICINE
QUARLES v. WAKEFERN FOOD CORPORATION
as 2:2021cv01488
Plaintiff:
TARA QUARLES
Defendant:
WAKEFERN FOOD CORPORATION
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
