Cases 71 - 80 of 1,693
CARTER v. ANGELS OF CARE, LLC et al
as 2:2024cv00790
Plaintiff:
MARGIE CARTER
Defendant:
ANGELS OF CARE, LLC and EDWARD RAPI
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
CLARY v. BRETT SABOL PLUMBING & HEATING, LLC et al
as 2:2023cv05053
Plaintiff:
NATHAN CLARY
Defendant:
BRETT SABOL PLUMBING & HEATING, LLC and BRETT T. SABOL
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Denial of Overtime Compensation
BROOKS v. SAME DAY DELIVERY, INC. et al
as 2:2023cv04977
Plaintiff:
TYHEA BROOKS
Defendant:
SAME DAY DELIVERY, INC. and FEDERAL EXPRESS
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Denial of Overtime Compensation
O'REILLY v. CITY OF PHILADELPHIA
as 2:2023cv05188
Plaintiff:
JOSEPH O'REILLY
Defendant:
CITY OF PHILADELPHIA
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
WARLOW v. BRIGHT EYE SOLAR, LLC. et al
as 5:2023cv04794
Plaintiff:
ADAM WARLOW
Defendant:
BRIGHT EYE SOLAR, LLC. and JAMES NODEN
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
SU v. INDEPENDENT KAREBLAZERS, INC. et al
as 5:2023cv04504
Plaintiff:
JULIE A. SU
Defendant:
INDEPENDENT KAREBLAZERS, INC. and KYLE FISCHL
GONZALEZ v. DOLLAR TREE, INC.
as 2:2024cv00087
Plaintiff:
BIANCA GONZALEZ
Defendant:
DOLLAR TREE, INC.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 206 Collect Unpaid Wages
SU v. JACK PEARS & ASSOCIATES, LLC et al
as 2:2023cv04921
Plaintiff:
JULIE A. SU
Defendant:
JACK PEARS & ASSOCIATES, LLC and ALLEN JACKSON
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
EVANS v. THE GENSIGHT GROUP INC. et al
as 2:2023cv05121
Plaintiff:
CHERYL EVANS
Defendant:
THE GENSIGHT GROUP INC. doing business as GENSIGHT and MICHAEL MENARD
EGAN v. REDEMPTION SPIRITS, LLC et al
as 2:2023cv04184
Plaintiff:
JENNIFER EGAN
Defendant:
REDEMPTION SPIRITS, LLC doing business as AMERICAN SPIRITS EXCHANGE LIMITED, RAYMOND WINTERS and PHILIP KOLODZIEY
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
