Cases 81 - 90 of 1,693
ABOUAKIL v. BLAZE AUTO, LLC et al
as 2:2023cv04480
Plaintiff:
NADA ABOUAKIL
Defendant:
BLAZE AUTO, LLC doing business as AUTO OUTLET OF PA and STEPHEN SILVERIO
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
GOKHMAN v. ACTALENT, INC.
as 2:2023cv04183
Plaintiff:
BRITTANY GOKHMAN
Defendant:
ACTALENT, INC.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
BROWN v. Curtis Bay Medical Waste Services, LLC
as 2:2023cv04168
Plaintiff:
JEFFREY BROWN
Defendant:
Curtis Bay Medical Waste Services, LLC and Sharps Compliance, Inc. of Texas
REYNOLDS v. CLEVELAND-CLIFFS STEEL, LLC
as 2:2023cv03923
Plaintiff:
MARK REYNOLDS
Defendant:
CLEVELAND-CLIFFS STEEL, LLC doing business as ARCELORMITTAL USA, INC.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
ROUSE et al v. WEST PHARMACEUTICAL SERVICES, INC.
as 2:2023cv03798
Plaintiff:
KELLIE ROUSE and JUSTIN STRAYHORN
Defendant:
WEST PHARMACEUTICAL SERVICES, INC.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
SU v. BLUE RIDGE HOME CARE INC. et al
as 2:2023cv04057
Plaintiff:
JULIE SU and JULIE A. SU
Defendant:
BLUE RIDGE HOME CARE INC. AND TUNJI OGUNMOLA, BLUE RIDGE HOME CARE INC. and TUNJI OGUNMOLA
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
DOWNEY v. PHENOM PEOPLE, INC.
as 2:2023cv03781
Plaintiff:
GEORGE DOWNEY
Defendant:
PHENOM PEOPLE, INC.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
v. INDEPENDENT KAREBLAZERS, LLC et al
as 2:2023cv04503
Defendant:
INDEPENDENT KAREBLAZERS, LLC and KYLE FISCHL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Enforcement of Administrative Subpoena
MURSE v. MURSE
as 5:2023cv03829
Plaintiff:
ADAM I. MURSE
Defendant:
MARY L. MURSE
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
LUNEMANN v. KOOMA III LLC
as 2:2023cv03704
Plaintiff:
CAYLA LUNEMANN
Defendant:
KOOMA III LLC and KOOMA III LLC doing business as (KOOMA ASIAN FUSION & SUSHI BAR)
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
