Other Statutes Cases filed in the US District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania
Cases 1 - 10 of 21
U.S. DURUM PRODUCTS LIMITED et al v. RIVIANA FOODS INC et al
as 5:2024cv02733
Plaintiff: U.S. DURUM PRODUCTS LIMITED and MARK DENMAN
Defendant: RIVIANA FOODS INC, JOHN AND JANE DOES 1-5 and ABC COS. 1-5
CONNELLY et al v. GREEN et al
as 5:2022cv01163
Defendant: COUNTY OF BERKS, JAMES GREEN, MATTHEW TRUSCOTT and others
Plaintiff: THOMAS P. CONNELLY, JR. and EMMA LYNNE DEAN
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
ARTZ v. BLAKEY et al
as 2:2020cv04290
Respondent: PATRICIA MCNAMARA, PATRICIA MAISANO, JOSEPH MEOLA and others
Petitioner: TRUSTEE EDWARD JAMES ARTZ
KOVALEV v. CITY OF PHILADELPHIA et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2019cv05790
Defendant: SHANNON G ZABEL, NANCY A KAMMERDEINER, PAULA WEISS and others
Plaintiff: SERGEI KOVALEV
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1964
KOVALEV v. STEPANSKY, DMD et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2019cv05579
Respondent: JOHN DOE I, IRINA STEPANSKY, DMD and JOHN AND JANE DOES 1-50
Petitioner: SERGEI KOVALEV
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961
RADIANT IMAGES, INC. et al v. FAST ADVANCE FUNDING, LLC et al
as 2:2018cv00758
Plaintiff: RADIANT IMAGES, INC. and GIANNA WOLFE
Defendant: FAST ADVANCE FUNDING, LLC and JOHN AND JANE DOE INVESTORS
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2014cv06440
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2014cv06362
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2014cv06361
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2014cv03784
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?