Cases 31 - 40 of 1,330
POST RITTENHOUSE HILL LP v. ANTONIO
as 2:2023cv04020
Plaintiff:
POST RITTENHOUSE HILL LP
Defendant:
KHALONI ANTONIO
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A. v. DUREN et al
as 2:2023cv04081
Defendant:
SHAUNESE DUREN, SHAWNESE DUREN and UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Plaintiff:
WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal- Petition to Quiet Ti
WILMINGTON SAVINGS FUND SOCIETY v. RANKIN et al
as 2:2023cv04126
Plaintiff:
WILMINGTON SAVINGS FUND SOCIETY
Defendant:
OWEN RANKIN and ARDILLIA C. RANKIN
CARRINGTON MORTGAGE SERCIES LLC - DUNS & BRADSTGREET#9397952238 v. SMITH
as 2:2023cv03729
Plaintiff:
CARRINGTON MORTGAGE SERVICES LLC -DUNS & BRADSTGREET#9397952238
Defendant:
DENIYA SMITH
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345 Foreclosure
JOHNSON et al v. WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A.
as 2:2023cv03478
Plaintiff:
TARAMI-ALIKE JOHNSON, TARAMI ALIKE JOHNSON ESTATE LIVING TRUST, Tarani Johnson and others
Defendant:
WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A. doing business as WELLS FARGO
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
CARRINGTON MORTGAGE SERVICES, LLC v. SMITH
as 2:2023cv03446
Plaintiff:
CARRINGTON MORTGAGE SERVICES, LLC
Defendant:
DENIYA SMITH
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345 Foreclosure
HUMPHREYS v. WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A.
as 5:2023cv03404
Plaintiff:
BRIAN HUMPHREYS
Defendant:
WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A.
Petitioner:
Senol Akdere
CARRINGTON MORTGAGE SERVICES LLC-DUNNS & BROADSTREET #939795238 v. SMITH
as 2:2023cv03376
Plaintiff:
CARRINGTON MORTGAGE SERVICES LLC-DUNNS & BROADSTREET #939795238
Defendant:
DENIVA SMITH and DENIYA SMITH
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1444 Notice of Removal- Foreclosure
WORSLEY v. THE SECRETARY OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT OF WASHINGTON DC
as 2:2023cv02995
Plaintiff:
LATISHA WORSLEY
Defendant:
THE SECRETARY OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT OF WASHINGTON DC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Notice of Removal
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
