Cases 81 - 90 of 5,557
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2023cv01443
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv01417
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Boldrini v. Shellpoint Mortgage Servicing et al
as 3:2023cv01615
Plaintiff:
Antonello Boldrini
Defendant:
Shellpoint Mortgage Servicing as New Rez LLC aka New Penn Financial LLC d/b/a Shellpoint Mortgage Services, Michael Niccolini, Lisa M. Gelb and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1964 Racketeering (RICO) Act
West Shore Home, LLC v. Chapman
as 1:2023cv01669
Plaintiff:
West Shore Home, LLC
Defendant:
Bryan Chapman
Fulmer v. Dexter Axle Company LLC
as 1:2023cv01692
Plaintiff:
Susan Fulmer
Defendant:
Dexter Axle Company LLC
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Jackson v. Direct Building Supplies LLC
as 4:2023cv01569
Plaintiff:
Gerard Jackson
Defendant:
Direct Building Supplies, LLC doing business as ReNu Solar
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Jackson v. Aragon Advertising, LLC
as 4:2023mc00812
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Lillman v. O'Reilly Automotive Stores, Inc.
as 3:2023cv01648
Plaintiff:
John Lillman
Defendant:
O'Reilly Automotive Stores, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Everett v. Exact Care Pharmacy, LLC
as 4:2023cv01649
Plaintiff:
Brenda Everett
Defendant:
Exact Care Pharmacy, LLC
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2023cv01533
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
