Cases 71 - 80 of 221
GODDARD SYSTEMS, INC. v. MIGLIACCIO
as 2:2014cv02207
Plaintiff:
GODDARD SYSTEMS, INC.
Defendant:
NEIL R. MIGLIACCIO
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1114
H.H. FRANCHISING SYSTEMS, INC. v. PERSONAL ANGELS, INC. et al
as 5:2014cv00201
Plaintiff:
H.H. FRANCHISING SYSTEMS, INC.
Defendant:
PERSONAL ANGELS, INC. , KATHRYN M. IANNIELLO SPENCE and SHAWN M. SPENCE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
GODDARD SYSTEMS, INC. v. MONBARREN et al
as 2:2013cv06951
Plaintiff:
GODDARD SYSTEMS, INC.
Defendant:
JOHN W. MONBARREN and ANNA ISALY MONBARREN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
OCEAN PETROLEUM, LLC v. MASCIANGELO
as 2:2013cv06816
Plaintiff:
OCEAN PETROLEUM, LLC
Defendant:
ALBERT MASCIANGELO
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
GODDARD SYSTEMS, INC. v. LOH et al
as 2:2013cv05951
Plaintiff:
GODDARD SYSTEMS, INC.
Defendant:
TAMARA J. LOH, CHRISTOPHER S. LOH and CHILDHOOD EXPLORATIONS, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
SHEIKH v. 7 ELEVEN, INC.
as 5:2013cv05807
Plaintiff:
NAUMAN SHEIKH
Defendant:
7 ELEVEN, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
7-ELEVEN, INC. v. SHEIKH
as 5:2013cv05771
Plaintiff:
7-ELEVEN, INC.
Defendant:
NAUMAN SHEIKH
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1330
AAMCO TRANSMISSIONS, INC. v. ROMANO et al
as 2:2013cv05747
Plaintiff:
AAMCO TRANSMISSIONS, INC.
Defendant:
ROBERT V. ROMANO and LINDA ROMANO
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
RICHARDSON et al v. WINMARK CORPORATION
as 2:2013cv04590
Plaintiff:
EDWIN H. RICHARDSON and RONA C. RICHARDSON
Defendant:
WINMARK CORPORATION
Counter_claimant:
WINMARK CORPORATION
Counter_defendant:
EDWIN H. RICHARDSON and RONA C. RICHARDSON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
GODDARD SYSTEMS, INC. et al v. CHUGHTAI et al
as 2:2013cv04387
Plaintiff:
GOODARD SYSTEMS, INC.
Defendant:
MAZHAR C. HUSSAIN CHUGHTAI, FAREEDA MAZUR CHUGHTAI, EDUCATION CONSULTANTS OF VIRGINIA INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Contract Dispute
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
