Cases 1 - 4 of 4
Bey v. State of Delaware et al
as 1:2009cv00446
Plaintiff:
Noble Said Bey
Defendant:
State Of Delaware, Court of Common Pleas, County of New Castle and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. ยง 241 Conspiracy Against Citizen Rights
TRANSCONTINENTAL GAS PIPE LINE COMPANY, LLC v. A PERMANENT EASEMENT FOR 0.203 ACRES AND TEMPORARY EASEMENTS FOR 0.797 ACRES OF LAND IN EAST BRANDYWINE TOWNSHIP, CHESTER COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA, TAX PARCEL NO. 30-06-0078 et al
as 2:2009cv01397
Plaintiff:
TRANSCONTINENTAL GAS PIPE LINE COMPANY, LLC, TRANSCONTINENTAL GAS PIPE LINE COMPANY, LLC, TRANSCONTINENTAL GAS PIPE LINE COMPANY, LLC and others
Defendant:
A PERMANENT EASEMENT FOR 0.203 ACRES AND TEMPORARY EASEMENTS FOR 0.797 ACRES OF LAND IN EAST BRANDYWINE TOWNSHIP, CHESTER COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA, TAX PARCEL NO. 30-06-0078, WILLIAM F. MCQUEEN, CORESTATES BANK and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
TRANSCONTINENTAL GAS PIPE LINE COMPANY, LLC v. A TEMPORARY EASEMENT FOR 0.202 ACRES OF LAND IN EAST BRANDYWINE TOWNSHIP, CHESTER COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA, TAX PARCEL NO. 30-06-0097 et al
as 2:2009cv01033
Plaintiff:
TRANSCONTINENTAL GAS PIPE LINE COMPANY, LLC
Defendant:
A TEMPORARY EASEMENT FOR 0.202 ACRES OF LAND IN EAST BRANDYWINE TOWNSHIP, CHESTER COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA, TAX PARCEL NO. 30-06-0097, DONALD A. GERHART, NANCY J. GERHART and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
TRANSCONTINENTAL GAS PIPE LINE COMPANY, LLC v. A PERMANENT EASEMENT FOR 0.361 ACRES AND TEMPORARY EASEMENTS FOR 0.536 ACRES OF LAND IN EAST BRANDYWINE TOWNSHIP, CHESTER COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA, TAX PARCEL NO. 30-06-0072 et al
as 2:2009cv01046
Plaintiff:
TRANSCONTINENTAL GAS PIPE LINE COMPANY, LLC
Defendant:
A PERMANENT EASEMENT FOR 0.361 ACRES AND TEMPORARY EASEMENTS FOR 0.536 ACRES OF LAND IN EAST BRANDYWINE TOWNSHIP, CHESTER COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA, TAX PARCEL NO. 30-06-0072, WILLIAM F. MCQUEEN, WELLS FARGO BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
