Cases 91 - 100 of 152
RORICK et al v. PFIZER, INC. et al
as 2:2012cv04089
Plaintiff:
NATHAN RORICK and HOLLY RORICK
Defendant:
PFIZER, INC. and GREENSTONE LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
DALTON et al v. MCCOURT ELECTRIC LLC et al
as 2:2012cv03568
Plaintiff:
DONALD DALTON , LORIS DALTON , ERIC DALTON and others
Defendant:
MCCOURT ELECTRIC LLC and INTERMATIC, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
SELECTIVE INSURANCE COMPANY OF THE SOUTHEAST v. OMEGA FLEX, INC. et al
as 2:2012cv03261
Plaintiff:
SELECTIVE INSURANCE COMPANY OF THE SOUTHEAST
Defendant:
OMEGA FLEX, INC. and T.L. CRAUN, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
THE CHARTER OAK FIRE INSURANCE COMPANY v. OMEGA FLEX, INC.
as 2:2012cv03198
Plaintiff:
THE CHARTER OAK FIRE INSURANCE COMPANY
Defendant:
OMEGA FLEX, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346
MASSACHUSETTS BAY INSURANCE COMPANY v. LASKO PRODUCTS, INC.
as 2:2012cv03171
Plaintiff:
MASSACHUSETTS BAY INSURANCE COMPANY
Defendant:
LASKO PRODUCTS, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
FIERRO v. DOE 1 et al
as 2:2012cv02849
Plaintiff:
SHELIA FIERRO
Defendant:
JOHN DOE 1, JOHN DOE 2, JOHN DOE 3 and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
PESJAR v. GLAXOSMITHKLINE, LLC et al
as 2:2012cv02848
Plaintiff:
RODERICK PESJAR
Defendant:
GLAXOSMITHKLINE, LLC , JOHN DOE 1, JOHN DOE 2 and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
RULL v. JOHN DOE 1 et al
as 2:2012cv02852
Plaintiff:
CARIDAD RULL
Defendant:
JOHN DOE 1, JOHN DOE 2, JOHN DOE 3 and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
STOEHER v. SMITHKLINE BEECHAM CORPORATION et al
as 2:2012cv02846
Plaintiff:
RONAL STOEHER
Defendant:
SMITHKLINE BEECHAM CORPORATION, JOHN DOE 1, JOHN DOE 2 and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
PABON v. JOHN DOE 1 et al
as 2:2012cv02851
Plaintiff:
THANIA PABON
Defendant:
JOHN DOE 1, JOHN DOE 2, JOHN DOE 3 and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
