Cases 81 - 90 of 367
MADDEN v. WAL-MART STORES EAST, LP
as 2:2019cv02252
Defendant:
WAL-MART STORES, INC., WALMART INC., WALMART STORES INC. and others
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL MADDEN and MADELL MADDEN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
BADMAN v. WAL-MART STORES, INC. et al
as 2:2019cv02168
Defendant:
WAL-MART STORES, INC., WAL-MART STORES EAST, LP and STORE
Plaintiff:
NAOMI M. BADMAN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
COSBY v. WAL-MART STORES EAST, LP et al
as 2:2019cv01406
Plaintiff:
SANDRA COSBY
Defendant:
WAL-MART STORES EAST, LP and WAL-MART STORES, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
FRENKEL et al v. WALMART STORE #2480 et al
as 3:2019cv00525
Plaintiff:
IRINA FRENKEL and ALEXANDER FRENKEL
Defendant:
WALMART STORE #2480, Wal-Mart Stores Inc. and Wal-mart stores east lp
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
ACOSTA v. WAL-MART STORES, EAST, LP et al
as 2:2019cv01177
Defendant:
WAL-MART STORES, EAST, LP, WAL-MART STORES EAST, INC., THF HAZLETON PARCEL W TRUST and others
Plaintiff:
MELODY ACOSTA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
BATTLE v. WAL-MART STORES, INC. et al
as 2:2019cv00945
Defendant:
WAL-MART STORES EAST, LP and WAL-MART STORES, INC.
Plaintiff:
JAMES BATTLE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
CARIOTI v. WAL-MART STORES, INC. #2830 et al
as 2:2019cv00865
Defendant:
WAL-MART STORES, INC. #2830 and JOHN DOE
Plaintiff:
JOSEPH CARIOTI
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
MCNEILL ET AL v. WAL-MART ET AL
as 2:2019cv00843
Plaintiff:
RITA MCNEIL, GERALD MCNEILL, JR. and RITA MCNEILL
Defendant:
WAL-MART and WAL-MART STORES, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Waterman v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.
as 3:2019cv00329
Plaintiff:
Antonia M. Waterman
Defendant:
Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
EVANS v. WAL-MART STORES EAST et al
as 2:2019cv00761
Defendant:
WAL-MART STORES, INC. and WAL-MART STORES EAST
Plaintiff:
SHANTELL EVANS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
