Other Personal Injury Cases filed in the Third Circuit Courts
CONNER et al v. ARMSTRONG WORLD INDUSTRIES, INC. et al
as 5:2010cv60134
Plaintiff: CALVIN C CONNER and MARY CONNER
Defendant: ARMSTRONG WORLD INDUSTRIES, INC., A C AND S, INC., EASTERN MAGNESIA TALC CO. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Account Receivable
VIGIL v. THE CELOTEX CORPORATION, INDIVIDUALLY AND AS SUCCESSOR-IN-INTEREST TO PHILIP CAREY CORP., BRIGGS MANUFACTURING CO., AND PANACON CORP., A CORPORATION INCORPORATED UNDER et al
as 2:2009cv68813
Plaintiff: JOSEPH J. VIGIL, JOSEPH J. VIGIL, JOSEPH J. VIGIL and others
Defendant: THE CELOTEX CORPORATION, INDIVIDUALLY AND AS SUCCESSOR-IN-INTEREST TO PHILIP CAREY CORP., BRIGGS MANUFACTURING CO., AND PANACON CORP., A CORPORATION INCORPORATED UNDER, THE CELOTEX CORPORATION, INDIVIDUALLY AND AS SUCCESSOR-IN-INTEREST TO PHILIP CAREY CORP., BRIGGS MANUFACTURING CO., AND PANACON CORP., A CORPORATION INCORPORATED UNDER, THE CELOTEX CORPORATION, INDIVIDUALLY AND AS SUCCESSOR-IN-INTEREST TO PHILIP CAREY CORP., BRIGGS MANUFACTURING CO., AND PANACON CORP., A CORPORATION INCORPORATED UNDER and others
ThirdParty Plaintiff: OWENS-CORNING FIBERGLAS CORP., OWENS-CORNING FIBERGLAS CORP., OWENS-CORNING FIBERGLAS CORP. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
Type: Torts - Injury None
SOUTHWORTH v. OWENS-CORNING FIBERGLAS CORP. et al
as 2:2007cv64290
Plaintiff: LENA SOUTHWORTH
Defendant: OWENS-CORNING FIBERGLAS CORP., OWENS-CORNING FIBERGLAS CORP., PITTSBURGH-CORNING CORP. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
PUOPOLO et al v. OWENS-CORNING FIBERGLAS CORP. et al
as 2:2007cv64210
Plaintiff: JOHN PUOPOLO and ANGELINA PUOPOLO
Defendant: OWENS-CORNING FIBERGLAS CORP., PITTSBURGH-CORNING CORP., GARLOCK, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?