Cases 21 - 30 of 153
TOWNSEND v. C.R. BARD, INC. et al
as 2:2016cv02577
Plaintiff:
NANCY TOWNSEND
Defendant:
C.R. BARD, INC. and BARD PERIPHERAL VASCULAR, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
AZAR v. C.R. BARD, INC. et al
as 2:2013cv00795
Plaintiff:
GEORGE AZAR
Defendant:
C.R. BARD, INC. and DAVOL, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
JOHNSON et al v. JOHNSON & JOHNSON et al
as 3:2012cv04315
Plaintiff:
CRYSTAL JOHNSON and JONATHAN W. JOHNSON
Defendant:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON, ETHICON, INC., GYNECARE WORLDWIDE and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
MOREFIELD v. JOHNSON & JOHNSON et al
as 3:2012cv04318
Plaintiff:
REMONA MOREFIELD
Defendant:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON, ETHICON, INC., GYNECARE WORLDWIDE and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
DUPONT v. JOHNSON & JOHNSON et al
as 3:2012cv04312
Plaintiff:
FRANKIE DUPONT
Defendant:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON, ETHICON, INC., GYNECARE WORLDWIDE and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
BARNES et al v. JOHNSON & JOHNSON et al
as 3:2012cv04310
Plaintiff:
MARGARET A. BARNES and CLARENCE A. BARNES
Defendant:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON, ETHICON, INC., GYNECARE WORLDWIDE and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
SMITH v. JOHNSON & JOHNSON et al
as 3:2012cv04320
Plaintiff:
SHANNON SMITH
Defendant:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON, ETHICON, INC., GYNECARE WORLDWIDE and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
KENNENDY et al v. JOHNSON & JOHNSON et al
as 3:2012cv04316
Plaintiff:
CAROLYN KENNENDY and JAMES KENNEDY
Defendant:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON, ETHICON, INC., GYNECARE WORLDWIDE and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
COX v. JOHNSON & JOHNSON et al
as 3:2012cv04311
Plaintiff:
BRENDA COX
Defendant:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON, ETHICON, INC., GYNECARE WORLDWIDE and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
PERRY v. JOHNSON & JOHNSON et al
as 3:2012cv04319
Plaintiff:
FREIDA PERRY
Defendant:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON, ETHICON, INC., GYNECARE WORLDWIDE and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
