Cases 41 - 50 of 66
LONG v. SMITHKLINE BEECHAM CORPORATION
as 2:2011cv00445
Plaintiff:
FRANCES LONG
Defendant:
SMITHKLINE BEECHAM CORPORATION and JOHN DOES 1-10
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
TERRY v. SMITHKLINE BEECHAM CORPORATION et al
as 2:2011cv00356
Plaintiff:
FRANCES TERRY
Defendant:
SMITHKLINE BEECHAM CORPORATION and JOHN DOES 1-10
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
LYLES v. SMITHKLINE BEECHAM CORPORATION
as 2:2010cv06696
Plaintiff:
FRANCES LYLES
Defendant:
SMITHKLINE BEECHAM CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
ADAMS et al v. GLAXOSMITHKLINE LLC
as 2:2010cv06310
Plaintiff:
FRANCES ADAMS , SHIRLEY AVERY , CAROL BENNER and others
Defendant:
GLAXOSMITHKLINE LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
HARRIS et al v. GLAXOSMITHKLINE LLC
as 2:2010cv06360
Plaintiff:
THELMA HARRIS , ROSIE MASK , GRANDVILLE MASSEY and others
Defendant:
GLAXOSMITHKLINE LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
ARON et al v. GLAXOSMITHKLINE LLC
as 2:2010cv06374
Plaintiff:
LENORE G. ARON , ROBERT BRENN , JUAN C. BRITO and others
Defendant:
GLAXOSMITHKLINE LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
SORRISIO v. SMITHKLINE BEECHAM CORPORATION
as 2:2010cv05975
Plaintiff:
FRANCES SORRISIO
Defendant:
SMITHKLINE BEECHAM CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391
PETERSON v. GLAXOSMITHKLINE LLC
as 2:2010cv05697
Plaintiff:
FRANCES PETERSON
Defendant:
GLAXOSMITHKLINE LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
MASHBURN v. ACANDS, INC. et al
as 2:2010cv79952
Plaintiff:
JAMES L MASHBURN and FRANCES V MASHBURN
Defendant:
ACANDS, INC., CAREY CANADA, INC., THE CELOTEX CORP. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
MALLETT v. SMITHKLINE BEECHAM CORPORATION
as 2:2010cv03329
Plaintiff:
FRANCES MALLETT
Defendant:
SMITHKLINE BEECHAM CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
