Cases 11 - 20 of 25
HARRIS v. A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST
as 2:2010cv54952
Plaintiff:
DURIEL L. HARRIS
Defendant:
A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 688
HARRIS et al v. CELOTEX CORP. et al
as 2:2010cv81967
Plaintiff:
CHARLES L. HARRIS and EMMA F. HARRIS
Defendant:
CELOTEX CORP. , EAGLE-PICHER INDUSTRIES, INC. , FIBERBOARD CORP. and others
Thirdparty_defendant:
MANVILLE CORPORATION ASBESTOS DISEASE COMPENSATION FUND
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
HARRIS v. A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST
as 2:2010cv52674
Plaintiff:
BARRY L. HARRIS
Defendant:
A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 688
HARRIS v. AMERICAN PRESIDENT LINES, LTD.
as 2:2010cv42557
Plaintiff:
SHEPPARD L. HARRIS
Defendant:
AMERICAN PRESIDENT LINES, LTD.
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 688
HARRIS v. FOSTER WHEELER ENERGY CORPORATION
as 2:2010cv42558
Plaintiff:
SHEPPARD L. HARRIS
Defendant:
FOSTER WHEELER ENERGY CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 688
ABDULLA v. FIBREBOARD CORPORATION
as 2:2010cv70760
Plaintiff:
BARRY L. HARRIS
Defendant:
FIBREBOARD CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
HARRIS v. FOSTER WHEELER COMPANY
as 2:2010cv40716
Plaintiff:
FOREST L HARRIS
Defendant:
FOSTER WHEELER COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 688
HARRIS V. UNITED STATES LINES INC. REORGANIZATION TRUST
as 2:2010cv37329
Plaintiff:
ERNEST L. HARRIS
Defendant:
UNITED STATES LINES INC. REORGANIZATION TRUST
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 688
HARRIS v. SEATRAIN LINES, INC.
as 2:2010cv32384
Plaintiff:
BARRY L. HARRIS
Defendant:
SEATRAIN LINES, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
HARRIS v. A.R. WILFLEY & SONS et al
as 2:2009cv77297
Plaintiff:
JAMES L. HARRIS and JAMES L. HARRIS
Defendant:
A.R. WILFLEY & SONS, ACF VALVES, ACF INDUSTRIES, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
