Cases 21 - 30 of 220
ROY v. FOSTER WHEELER COMPANY
as 2:2011cv40109
Plaintiff:
GLENN ROY
Defendant:
FOSTER WHEELER COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 0688
LANSDELL v. 3M et al
as 2:2011cv66531
Plaintiff:
HERMAN GLENN LANSDELL
Defendant:
3M, ALLIS CHALMERS CORPORATION PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST, AMERICAN OPTICAL CORPORATION and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
ROUGLE v. AMERICAN STANDARD, INC. et al
as 2:2011cv66285
Plaintiff:
GLENN L. ROUGLE
Defendant:
AMERICAN STANDARD, INC., METROPOLITAN LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY, TRANE US, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
PERDUE et al v. ARMSTRONG WORLD INDUSTRIES, INC.
as 2:2011cv64374
Plaintiff:
GLENN PERDUE and MAXINE PERDUE
Defendant:
ARMSTRONG WORLD INDUSTRIES, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
FINK v. GARLOCK, INC.
as 2:2011cv65669
Plaintiff:
GLENN M FINK
Defendant:
GARLOCK, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
ARMSTRONG et al v. ARMSTRONG WORLD INDUSTRIES, INC.
as 2:2011cv64755
Plaintiff:
FREDERICK GLENN ARMSTRONG and JULENE ARMSTRONG
Defendant:
ARMSTRONG WORLD INDUSTRIES, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
WHITMILL et al v. H.K. PORTER COMPANY, INC.
as 2:2011cv64969
Plaintiff:
GLENN ALLEN WHITMILL and SUZANNA WHITMILL
Defendant:
H.K. PORTER COMPANY, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
DAVIS et al v. ARMSTRONG WORLD INDUSTRIES, INC.
as 2:2011cv64323
Plaintiff:
GLENN E. DAVIS and SANDRA DAVIS
Defendant:
ARMSTRONG WORLD INDUSTRIES, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
ALEXANDER v. 3M et al
as 2:2011cv63936
Defendant:
3M, COOPER INDUSTRIES LLC, GOODRICH CORPORATION and others
Plaintiff:
GLENN ALEXANDER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
SOUTH v. GAF CORPORATION et al
as 2:2011cv63998
Plaintiff:
GERALD GLENN SOUTH
Defendant:
GAF CORPORATION, ROCKWOOL MANUFACTURING COMPANY, PITTSBURGH CORNING CORPORATION and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
