Cases 31 - 40 of 77
CARLSON v. FIBREBOARD CORPORATION et al
as 2:2010cv73630
Plaintiff:
ERIC J. CARLSON
Defendant:
FIBREBOARD CORPORATION , JAMES R. COLSON and JAMES H. COLWELL
Thirdparty_defendant:
JAMES E. BURKE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
MAIBEN v. FIBREBOARD CORPORATION et al
as 2:2010cv76002
Plaintiff:
ERIC G. MAIBEN
Defendant:
FIBREBOARD CORPORATION , JAMES R. COLSON and JAMES H. COLWELL
Thirdparty_defendant:
JAMES E. BURKE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
DOMINGUEZ v. FIBREBOARD CORPORATION
as 2:2010cv70264
Plaintiff:
ERIC M. DOMINGUEZ
Defendant:
FIBREBOARD CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
WIGHT v. FIBREBOARD CORPORATION
as 2:2010cv71306
Plaintiff:
ERIC E. WIGHT
Defendant:
FIBREBOARD CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
PASZTER v. FIBREBOARD CORPORATION
as 2:2010cv72146
Plaintiff:
ERIC E. PASZTER
Defendant:
FIBREBOARD CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
MOORE v. FIBREBOARD CORPORATION
as 2:2010cv71947
Plaintiff:
ERIC J. MOORE
Defendant:
FIBREBOARD CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
GAYNOR v. FIBREBOARD CORPORATION
as 2:2010cv70522
Plaintiff:
ERIC GAYNOR
Defendant:
FIBREBOARD CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
SANCHEZ et al v. 1-100 DOES
as 2:2010cv67122
Plaintiff:
KATHY SANCHEZ , MELZINER WORM , BERTIE A. BROWNLOW, JR. and others
Defendant:
1-100 DOES
Thirdparty_defendant:
ACCIDENT & CASUALTY INSURANCE COMPANY OF WINTERTHUR, TUREGUM INSURANCE CO., NEW HAMPSHIRE INSURANCE COMPANY and others
Thirdparty_plaintiff:
1-100 DOES and AUBURN TECHNOLOGY INC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
ROSENBERG v. SEATRAIN LINES, INC.
as 2:2010cv33876
Plaintiff:
ERIC R. ROSENBERG
Defendant:
SEATRAIN LINES, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
YOUNG v. SEATRAIN LINES, INC.
as 2:2010cv34680
Plaintiff:
ERIC D. YOUNG
Defendant:
SEATRAIN LINES, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
