Cases 41 - 50 of 2,440
QUIROZ-GREEN et al v. THOMAS DEE ENGINEERING COMPANY et al
as 2:2011cv67760
Plaintiff:
SUZANNE QUIROZ-GREEN and SERENA GREENE
Defendant:
THOMAS DEE ENGINEERING COMPANY, INGERSOLL-RAND COMPANY, METALCLAD INSULATION CORPORATION and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
QUIROZ-GREEN et al v. THOMAS DEE ENGINEERING COMPANY et al
as 2:2011cv67756
Plaintiff:
SUZANNE QUIROZ-GREEN and SERENA GREEN
Defendant:
THOMAS DEE ENGINEERING COMPANY, INGERSOLL-RAND COMPANY, METALCLAD INSULATION CORPORATION and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
HICKS v. ACANDS, INC.
as 2:2011cv68575
Plaintiff:
THOMAS N HICKS
Defendant:
ACANDS, INC.
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 0688
THOMAS v. AMERICAN EAGLE TANKER CORP.
as 5:2011cv54251
Plaintiff:
DRONE THOMAS
Defendant:
AMERICAN EAGLE TANKER CORP.
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 0688
SMITH v. FOSTER WHEELER COMPANY
as 2:2011cv57353
Plaintiff:
THOMAS E. SMITH
Defendant:
FOSTER WHEELER COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 0688
VAIL v. AMERICAN PRESIDENT LINES LTD.
as 2:2011cv59372
Plaintiff:
THOMAS H VAIL
Defendant:
AMERICAN PRESIDENT LINES LTD.
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 0688
MCCOY v. A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST, ET AL
as 2:2011cv56184
Plaintiff:
THOMAS W MCCOY, II
Defendant:
A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST, ET AL
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 0688
WHITE v. MANVILLE CORPORATION ASBESTOS DISEASE COMPANSATION FUND
as 2:2011cv54580
Plaintiff:
THOMAS L. WHITE
Defendant:
MANVILLE CORPORATION ASBESTOS DISEASE COMPANSATION FUND
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 0688
WHITE v. ACANDS, INC.
as 2:2011cv57492
Plaintiff:
THOMAS L. WHITE
Defendant:
ACANDS, INC.
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 0688
THOMAS v. MANVILLE CORPORATION ASBESTOS DISEASE COMPENSATION FUND
as 2:2011cv54794
Plaintiff:
DRONE THOMAS
Defendant:
MANVILLE CORPORATION ASBESTOS DISEASE COMPENSATION FUND
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 0688
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
