Cases 51 - 60 of 411
KING et al FOSTER WHEELER COMPANY
as 2:2011cv35815
Plaintiff:
ALCEE KING , WILLARD E. BARTEL and DAVID C. PEEBLES
Defendant:
FOSTER WHEELER COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 0688
KING et al v. A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST
as 2:2011cv35816
Plaintiff:
CHARLES KING , WILLARD E. BARTEL and DAVID C. PEEBLES
Defendant:
A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 0688
KING et al v. AMERICAN TRADING AND PRODUCTION CORP.
as 2:2011cv35821
Plaintiff:
JAMES E. KING and CREIGHTON E. MILLER
Defendant:
AMERICAN TRADING AND PRODUCTION CORP.
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 0688
KING v. MANVILLE CORPORATION ASBESTOS DISEASE COMPENSATION FUND
as 2:2011cv35826
Plaintiff:
ROBERT A KING
Defendant:
MANVILLE CORPORATION ASBESTOS DISEASE COMPENSATION FUND
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 0688
KING v. A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST
as 2:2011cv35817
Plaintiff:
DAVID E. KING
Defendant:
A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 0688
KING et al v. ACANDS, INC.
as 2:2011cv35820
Plaintiff:
JAMES E. KING , WILLARD E. BARTEL and DAVID C PEEBLES
Defendant:
ACANDS, INC.
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 0688
KING v. A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST
as 2:2011cv35823
Plaintiff:
LEE R. KING
Defendant:
A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 0688
KING v. 3M et al
as 2:2011cv66524
Plaintiff:
EDDIE KING
Defendant:
3M, ALLIS CHALMERS CORPORATION PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST, AMERICAN OPTICAL CORPORATION and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
KING v. 3M et al
as 2:2011cv66525
Plaintiff:
EDDIE KING
Defendant:
3M, ALLIS CHALMERS CORPORATION PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST, AMERICAN OPTICAL CORPORATION and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
KING v. AMERICAN STANDARD, INC. et al
as 2:2011cv63966
Plaintiff:
CHARLES F. KING, SR.
Defendant:
AMERICAN STANDARD, INC. , AMSTED RAIL COMPANY, INC. , GENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANY and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
