Cases 61 - 70 of 99
SANCHEZ v. FIBREBOARD CORPORATION et al
as 2:2010cv77473
Plaintiff:
RAUL SANCHEZ
Defendant:
FIBREBOARD CORPORATION , JAMES R. COLSON and JAMES H. COLWELL
Thirdparty_defendant:
JAMES E. BURKE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
SANCHEZ v. FIBREBOARD CORPORATION et al
as 2:2010cv77474
Plaintiff:
TRINIDAD SANCHEZ
Defendant:
FIBREBOARD CORPORATION , JAMES R. COLSON and JAMES H. COLWELL
Thirdparty_defendant:
JAMES E. BURKE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
RIVERA-SANCHEZ v. FIBREBOARD CORPORATION et al
as 2:2010cv77250
Plaintiff:
JUAN RIVERA-SANCHEZ
Defendant:
FIBREBOARD CORPORATION , JAMES R. COLSON and JAMES H. COLWELL
Thirdparty_defendant:
JAMES E. BURKE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
SANCHEZ v. FIBREBOARD CORPORATION et al
as 2:2010cv77471
Plaintiff:
PACO M. SANCHEZ
Defendant:
FIBREBOARD CORPORATION , JAMES R. COLSON and JAMES H. COLWELL
Thirdparty_defendant:
JAMES E. BURKE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
SANCHEZ v. A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST
as 2:2010cv40312
Plaintiff:
ELIAS R. SANCHEZ
Defendant:
A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 688
SANCHEZ v. FIBREBOARD CORPORATION
as 2:2010cv72489
Plaintiff:
LUIS S. SANCHEZ
Defendant:
FIBREBOARD CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
SANCHEZ v. FIBREBOARD CORPORATION
as 2:2010cv72488
Plaintiff:
CARLOS H. SANCHEZ
Defendant:
FIBREBOARD CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
SANCHEZ v. FIBREBOARD CORPORATION
as 2:2010cv72490
Plaintiff:
MANUEL SANCHEZ
Defendant:
FIBREBOARD CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
v. SANCHEZ et al
as 2:2010cv38135
Defendant:
RICARDO SANCHEZ , AGWILINES INC., AMERICAN EXPORT ISBRANDTSEN and others
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 688
SANCHEZ v. A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST et al
as 2:2010cv38151
Plaintiff:
MODESTO R. SANCHEZ
Defendant:
A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST, ACANDS, INC., ACORN IRON & SUPPLY CO. and others
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 688
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
