Cases 71 - 80 of 9,187
KENNEDY et al v. THE CELOTEX CORPORATION et al
as 2:2011cv67181
Plaintiff:
BOBBY D. KENNEDY and FREDA D. KENNEDY
Defendant:
THE CELOTEX CORPORATION , EALGE-PICHER INDUSTRIES, INC. , ARMSTRONG WORLD INDUSTRIES, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
RUBY v. CELOTEX CORPORATION
as 2:2011cv66935
Plaintiff:
S. OLIVER RUBY
Defendant:
CELOTEX CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
BROWN et al v. CELOTEX CORPORATION
as 2:2011cv66944
Plaintiff:
ERNEST C. BROWN and THELMA E. BROWN
Defendant:
CELOTEX CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
DARLEY et al v. CELOTEX CORPORATION
as 2:2011cv66869
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM C. DARLEY and SYBIL W. DARLEY
Defendant:
CELOTEX CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
ELAM et al v. CELOTEX CORPORATION
as 2:2011cv66868
Plaintiff:
JAMES ELAM and SARAH L. ELAM
Defendant:
CELOTEX CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
BRITT et al v. OWENS-CORNING FIBERGLAS CORPORATION et al
as 2:2011cv67157
Plaintiff:
DANIEL L. BRITT and NORMA C. BRITT
Defendant:
OWENS-CORNING FIBERGLAS CORPORATION , THE CELOTEX CORPORATION , EAGLE-PICHER INDUSTRIES, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
WILSON v. THE CELOTEX CORPORATION et al
as 2:2011cv67168
Plaintiff:
MELVIN F. WILSON
Defendant:
THE CELOTEX CORPORATION , EAGLE-PICHER INDUSTRIES, INC. , ARMSTRONG WORLD INDUSTRIES, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
DENNARD et al v. CELOTEX CORPORATION
as 2:2011cv66870
Plaintiff:
JAMES DENNARD and FRANCES J. DENNARD
Defendant:
CELOTEX CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
WOOD et al v. CELOTEX CORPORATION
as 2:2011cv66955
Plaintiff:
THOMAS E. WOOD and DOROTHY B. WOOD
Defendant:
CELOTEX CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
BUNCH et al v. CELOTEX CORPORATION
as 2:2011cv66947
Plaintiff:
JAMES C. BUNCH and SUSAN S. BUNCH
Defendant:
CELOTEX CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
