Cases 1 - 8 of 8
GREEN v. ARMSTRONG WORLD INDUSTRIES, INC. et al
as 2:2010cv80405
Plaintiff:
JOSH GREEN
Defendant:
ARMSTRONG WORLD INDUSTRIES, INC., EAGLE-PICHER INDUSTRIES, INC., FIBREBOARD CORPORATION and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
MINOR et al v. ARMSTRONG CORK COMPANY et al
as 2:2010cv80198
Plaintiff:
JOSH T. MINOR , THOMAS J. MINOR and BESSIE MINOR
Defendant:
ARMSTRONG CORK COMPANY, ACANDS, INC., EAGLE-PICHER INDUSTRIES, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
DAWSON v. FIBREBOARD CORPORATION et al
as 2:2010cv74120
Plaintiff:
JOSH DAWSON
Defendant:
FIBREBOARD CORPORATION , JAMES R. COLSON and JAMES H. COLWELL
Thirdparty_defendant:
JAMES E. BURKE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
DAWSON v. A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST
as 2:2010cv40767
Plaintiff:
JOSH DAWSON
Defendant:
A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 688
MARTIN v. AFRAM LINES et al
as 2:2010cv38107
Plaintiff:
JOSH JR MARTIN
Defendant:
AFRAM LINES , AMERICAN CONDOR STEAMSHIP CORP., AMERICAN EXPORT ISBRANDTSEN and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
MARTIN v. AFRAM LINES et al
as 2:2010cv30668
Plaintiff:
JOSH MARTIN
Defendant:
AFRAM LINES , AMERICAN CONDOR STEAMSHIP CORP., AMERICAN EXPORT ISBRANDTSEN and others
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 688 Jones Act
WHITLEY v. A-BEX CORPORATION et al
as 2:2008cv73798
Plaintiff:
JOSH WHITLEY, JOSH WHITLEY, JOSH WHITLEY and others
Defendant:
A-BEX CORPORATION, A-BEX CORPORATION, GAF CORPORATION and others
ThirdParty Defendant:
ASBESTOS CORPORATION, LTD., ATLAS TURNER, INC., LAC D'AMIANTE DU QUEBEC and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity
COLLINS et al v. AMCHEM PRODUCTS, INC. et al
as 2:2007cv66776
Plaintiff:
JOSH COLLINS, JR. and SUSIE MAE COLLINS
Defendant:
AMCHEM PRODUCTS, INC., AMERICAN OPTICAL CORPORATION, CERTAIN TEED CORPORATION and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
