Cases 1 - 10 of 25
LOVETT v. A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST
as 2:2011cv57062
Plaintiff:
DALE S. LOVETT
Defendant:
A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 0688
LOVETT v. FOSTER WHEELER COMPANY
as 2:2011cv57284
Plaintiff:
MOSE J. LOVETT
Defendant:
FOSTER WHEELER COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 0688
LOVETT et al v. ACANDS, INC.
as 2:2011cv36249
Plaintiff:
MOSE J. LOVETT , CREIGHTON E. MILLER and WILLARD E. BARTEL
Defendant:
ACANDS, INC.
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 0688
LOVETT v. MANVILLE CORPORATION ASBESTOS DISEASE COMPENSATION FUND
as 2:2011cv36250
Plaintiff:
MOSE J. LOVETT
Defendant:
MANVILLE CORPORATION ASBESTOS DISEASE COMPENSATION FUND
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 0688
LOVETT et al v. CENTRAL GULF LINES STEAMSHIP
as 2:2011cv36251
Plaintiff:
MOSE J. LOVETT and CREIGHTON E. MILLER
Defendant:
CENTRAL GULF LINES STEAMSHIP
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 0688
LOVETT v. FIBREBOARD CORPORATION et al
as 2:2010cv75928
Plaintiff:
MILLAGE LOVETT
Defendant:
FIBREBOARD CORPORATION , JAMES R. COLSON and JAMES H. COLWELL
Thirdparty_defendant:
JAMES E. BURKE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
LOVETT v. TODD SHIPYARDS CORPORATION et al
as 2:2010cv69359
Plaintiff:
ROBERT LOVETT
Defendant:
TODD SHIPYARDS CORPORATION and FOSTER WHEELER LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
LOVETT v. SEATRAIN LINES, INC.
as 2:2010cv32957
Plaintiff:
MILLAGE LOVETT
Defendant:
SEATRAIN LINES, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
LOVETT V. MEAD, ET AL.
as 2:2009cv87591
Plaintiff:
JACK LOVETT
Defendant:
A.P. SERVICES, INC., A.W. CHESTERTON COMPANY, AMERICAN STANDARD, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
LOVETT v. U.S. RUBBER COMPANY (UNIROYAL)
as 2:2009cv90117
Plaintiff:
JACK LOVETT and JACK LOVETT
Defendant:
U.S. RUBBER COMPANY (UNIROYAL)
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
