Cases 1 - 10 of 1,957
DIGITAL DATA DEVICES, INC. v. RAANAN
as 2:2024cv04012
Plaintiff:
DIGITAL DATA DEVICES, INC.
Defendant:
DAVID RAANAN and Ely Eddi
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
CASTLE et al v. JOHNSON & JOHNSON et al
as 3:2024cv06090
Plaintiff:
MARY JANE CASTLE and BRANDI BALDWIN-JONES
Defendant:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON and KENVUE INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
MCCLARY v. MARR et al
as 1:2024cv06005
Plaintiff:
JAMES W. MCCLARY
Defendant:
CHRISTOPHER P. MARR, STEVEN VOGT, GARY BRITTON, JR. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
BROWN v. BMW OF RAMSEY
as 2:2024cv05893
Plaintiff:
CLEVELAND H.V. BROWN
Defendant:
BMW OF RAMSEY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
PRINCE OF PEACE ENTERPRISES, INC. v. GEOPEAK ENERGY, LLC et al
as 3:2024cv02610
Plaintiff:
PRINCE OF PEACE ENTERPRISES, INC.
Defendant:
GEOPEAK ENERGY, LLC and MICHAEL KOPING
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
LIVINGSTON v. UBER et al
as 2:2024cv05839
Plaintiff:
BRADLEY TALMADGE LIVINGSTON
Defendant:
UBER and LYFT
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
MATTHEWS v. SALDUTTI LAW GROUP LLC et al
as 2:2024cv01662
Plaintiff:
SAMEERAH M. MATTHEWS
Defendant:
SALDUTTI LAW GROUP LLC and ROBERT L. SALDUTTI ESQ.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
GRODNICK v. JOHNSON & JOHNSON CONSUMER COMPANIES, INC. et al
as 3:2024cv02616
Plaintiff:
DAVID GRODNICK
Defendant:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON CONSUMER COMPANIES, INC., KENVUE INC. and JOHNSON & JOHNSON CONSUMER, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
MOSCATO et al v. LOPINTO et al
as 3:2024cv05720
Defendant:
ROBERT MOSCATO, LORI MOSCATO, SWOF VENTURES, LP. and others
Cause Of Action: 12 U.S.C. § 22 Securities Fraud
LILY OF THE SKY, LLC v. JIMENEZ
as 2:2024cv05629
Plaintiff:
LILY OF THE SKY, LLC
Defendant:
JESSIKA JIMENEZ
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
