Cases 81 - 90 of 168
CULVER et al v. FINISH LINE 38 et al
as 1:2015cv03646
Plaintiff:
MARK CULVER and PATRICK ROBB
Defendant:
FINISH LINE 38, JEREMY SOLOMON and JOHN DOES 1-10
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
ATIS v. FREEDOM MORTGAGE CORPORATION et al
as 1:2015cv03424
Plaintiff:
DAVID ATIS
Defendant:
FREEDOM MORTGAGE CORPORATION and JOHN DOES 1-10
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
WANG et al v. CHAPEI LLC et al
as 3:2015cv02950
Plaintiff:
WEIGANG WANG and HAILONG YU
Defendant:
CHAPEI LLC , CHA LEE LO and JOHN DOES 1-10
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
CHISHOLM v. UNITED STATES POST OFFICE et al
as 2:2015cv02173
Plaintiff:
KEVIN CHISHOLM
Defendant:
UNITED STATES POST OFFICE, POSTMASTER GENERAL, JOHN DOES 1-10 and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 206
ROBLES v. VORNADO REALTY TRUST et al
as 2:2015cv01406
Plaintiff:
PAULA ROBLES
Defendant:
VORNADO REALTY TRUST , URBAN EDGE PROPERTIES , HOWARD GOODMAN and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2014cv07990
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
RODRIGUEZ et al v. CANADA DRY BOTTLING COMPANY, L.P. et al
as 2:2014cv06897
Plaintiff:
IVAN RODRIGUEZ , MARCELINO MARTE and JESUS RODRIGUEZ
Defendant:
CANADA DRY BOTTLING COMPANY, L.P. , ABC CORPORATION (1-20), XYZ CORPORATION (1-20) and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
JONES v. SCRAP et al
as 1:2014cv06753
Plaintiff:
KEITH JONES
Defendant:
SGT. SCRAP, REVOLUTION RECYCLING, LLC, SALVAGE RECYCLING, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
PAPA v. TITLE CLOSING SERVICES, LLC et al
as 2:2014cv05871
Plaintiff:
JOSEPHINE PAPA
Defendant:
TITLE CLOSING SERVICES, LLC and JOHN DOES 1-10
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
FLORES et al v. 1401 OCEAN LLC et al
as 3:2014cv03466
Plaintiff:
SANTIAGO FLORES , BISMELLAH FLEMMING and ALPHONSO REEVEY
Defendant:
1401 OCEAN LLC, STUART PODOLSKY, JAY PODOLSKY and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
