Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 Cases filed in New Jersey
Cases 11 - 20 of 121
LUENSE et al v. KONICA MINOLTA BUSINESS SOLUTIONS U.S.A., INC. et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2020cv06827
Plaintiff: NEIL ROSE, DANIEL F SETTNEK, PAMELA PEARSON and others
Defendant: BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF KONICA MINOLTA BUSINESS SOLUTIONS U.S.A., INC., KONICA MINOLTA 401(K) PLAN COMMITTEE, SUSAN MCCARTHY and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.
TRUSTEES OF THE UNITED FOOD AND COMMERCIAL WORKERS UNION LOCAL 312 BENEFIT FUND (F/K/A THE UFCW LOCAL 312 HEALTH FUND) FOR AND ON BEHALF OF THEMSELVES AND SAID FUND, AND THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES et al v. CLEAN TEX SERVICES, INC.
as 2:2019cv21903
Defendant: CLEAN TEX SERVICES, INC., CLEAN TEX SOLUTIONS and CLEAN TEX
Plaintiff: TRUSTEES OF THE UNITED FOOD AND COMMERCIAL WORKERS UNION LOCAL 312 BENEFIT FUND (F/K/A THE UFCW LOCAL 312 HEALTH FUND) FOR AND ON BEHALF OF THEMSELVES AND SAID FUND, AND THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES and THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
TRUSTEES OF THE UNITED FOOD AND COMMERCIAL WORKERS UNION LOCAL 312 BENEFIT FUND (F/K/A THE UFCW LOCAL 312 HEALTH FUND) FOR AND ON BEHALF OF THEMSELVES AND SAID FUND, AND THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES et al v. CLEAN TEX SERVICES, INC.
as 3:2019cv21903
Defendant: CLEAN TEX SERVICES, INC., CLEAN TEX SOLUTIONS and CLEAN TEX
Plaintiff: TRUSTEES OF THE UNITED FOOD AND COMMERCIAL WORKERS UNION LOCAL 312 BENEFIT FUND (F/K/A THE UFCW LOCAL 312 HEALTH FUND) FOR AND ON BEHALF OF THEMSELVES AND SAID FUND, AND THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES and THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
TRUSTEES OF THE UNITED FOOD AND COMMERCIAL WORKERS UNION LOCAL 312 BENEFIT FUND et al v. MERWICK CARE & REHABILITATION CENTER, LLC
as 2:2019cv21902
Plaintiff: UNITED FOOD AND COMMERCIAL WORKERS UNION LOCAL 312, TRUSTEES OF THE UNITED FOOD AND COMMERCIAL WORKERS UNION LOCAL 312 BENEFIT FUND (F/K/A THE UFCW LOCAL 312 HEALTH FUND) FOR AND ON BEHALF OF THEMSELVES AND SAID FUND, AND THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES, THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES and others
Defendant: MERWICK CARE & REHABILITATION CENTER, LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
NIHAD v. UNITED PARCEL SERVICE-HR DEPT.
as 2:2019cv16474
Plaintiff: NIHAD F. ELKHOLY
Defendant: UNITED PARCEL SERVICE-HR DEPT.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001
SERIO, et al v. SIMKAR, LLC
as 2:2019cv12926
Plaintiff: JOSEPH P CALABRO and GEORGE F. SERIO
Defendant: SIMKAR, LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001
ERHART et al v. PLASTER LOCAL 8 ANNUITY FUND et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2019cv06812
Defendant: THE TRUSTEES OF THE PLASTERERS LOCAL 8 ANNUITY FUND, PLASTERERS LOCAL 8 ANNUITY FUND, JOSEPH DIEHL and others
Plaintiff: JOHN F. PEARCY, CYNTHIA SCIPIONE, PATRICK JONES and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
INTERNATIONAL BROTHERHOOD OF TEAMSTERS, LOCAL NO. 863 et al v. SYSCO METRO NEW YORK, LLC f/k/a SYSCO FOODS OF METRO NEW YORK, LLC et al
as 2:2018cv12884
Plaintiff: INTERNATIONAL BROTHERHOOD OF TEAMSTERS, LOCAL NO. 863, MARGARET CHAVIS, EVAN G. SCOTT and others
Defendant: SYSCO CORPORATION, SYSCO METRO NEW YORK, LLC f/k/a SYSCO FOODS OF METRO NEW YORK, LLC, SYSCO CORPORATION RETIREMENT PLAN and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001
TRUSTEES OF THE UNITED FOOD AND COMMERCIAL WORKERS UNION LOCAL 312 BENEFIT FUND v. MEG TACKLE IMPORTS, INC We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2018cv11715
Plaintiff: TRUSTEES OF THE UNITED FOOD AND COMMERCIAL WORKERS UNION LOCAL 312 BENEFIT FUND (F/K/A THE UFCW LOCAL 312 HEALTH FUND) FOR AND ON BEHALF OF THEMSELVES AND SAID FUND, AND THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES and TRUSTEES OF THE UNITED FOOD AND COMMERCIAL WORKERS UNION LOCAL 312 BENEFIT FUND
Defendant: MEG TACKLE IMPORTS, INC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1145
MITCHELL F. REITER, M.D., PC v. BLUE CROSS BLUE SHIELD OF GEORGIA
as 2:2018cv01927
Plaintiff: MITCHELL F. REITER, M.D., PC
Defendant: BLUE CROSS BLUE SHIELD OF GEORGIA
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?