Cases 161 - 170 of 1,289
HACKER v. ELECTRIC LAST MILE SOLUTIONS INC. et al
as 2:2022cv00545
Defendant:
ELECTRIC LAST MILE SOLUTIONS INC., FORUM MERGER III CORP., JAMES TAYLOR and others
Plaintiff:
SCOTT T. HACKER
BUSHANSKY v. TRISTATE CAPITAL HOLDINGS, INC. et al
as 2:2022cv00509
Plaintiff:
STEPHEN BUSHANSKY
Defendant:
TRISTATE CAPITAL HOLDINGS, INC., DAVID L BONVENUTO, JAMES J DOLAN and others
NIEWENHUIS v. KENDALL et al
as 3:2021cv20513
Plaintiff:
LOREEN NIEWENHUIS
Defendant:
KEITH J. KENDALL, JOHN T. MAXWELL, DANIEL BARBER and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
KENT v. ELLIS et al
as 2:2021cv20754
Defendant:
RICHARD SHAWN ELLIS, HOTEL CARBON HQ, INC., R. SHAWN ELLIS and others
Plaintiff:
KEVIN DOOLEY KENT
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 754
KENT v. DENISE et al
as 2:2022cv00388
Plaintiff:
KEVIN DOOLEY KENT
Defendant:
DENISE JORDAN, ENTERCORE, INC., ORANGE SPLENDOR, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 754 Receiver of Property in Different Districts
PRADOS v. METROMILE, INC. et al
as 2:2022cv00100
Plaintiff:
HERNAN PRADOS
Defendant:
METROMILE, INC., DAN PRESTON, COLIN BRYANT and others
MARCHESE v. JERSEY CITY POWER & LIGHT COMPANY et al
as 3:2021cv20365
Plaintiff:
JAMES L MARCHESE
Defendant:
JERSEY CITY POWER & LIGHT COMPANY, FIRST ENERGY CORP., JOHN DOES 1-25 and others
WILSON v. MONMOUTH REAL ESTATE INVESTMENT CORPORATION et al
as 3:2022cv00074
Plaintiff:
JORDAN WILSON
Defendant:
MONMOUTH REAL ESTATE INVESTMENT CORPORATION, KIERNAN CONWAY, BRIAN H. HAIMM and others
U.S. SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION v. MALIK et al
as 2:2021cv20300
Plaintiff:
U.S. SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Defendant:
USAMA MALIK and LAUREN S WOOD
Intervenor:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 12 U.S.C. § 22
ROIZMAN v. HOEGH LNG PARTNERS LP et al
as 2:2021cv19613
Plaintiff:
ARTHUR F. ROIZMAN
Defendant:
HOEGH LNG PARTNERS LP, SVEINUNG J. S. STOHLE, HAVARD FURU and others
Petitioner:
RAY F. ANDERSON
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
