Cases 11 - 20 of 1,289
HUNTER v. KORMAN COMMUNITIES
as 2:2024cv01213
Plaintiff:
JENEE HUNTER
Defendant:
KORMAN COMMUNITIES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
CHRISTINA: HUNTER v. COLE GROUP REALTY
as 2:2024cv01214
Plaintiff:
JENEE CHRISTINA: HUNTER
Defendant:
COLE GROUP REALTY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Elas v. Prince et al
as 2:2024cv01050
Petitioner:
CAMERON WYATT, Pham Duy Anh Dang and ARMAN REYES
Plaintiff:
Antonie Elas and TREY GREENE
Defendant:
ZAC PRINCE, FLORI MARQUEZ, Amit Cheela and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Securities Violation
D'AGOSTINO v. INNODATA INC. et al
as 2:2024cv00971
Plaintiff:
DAVID D'AGOSTINO
Defendant:
INNODATA INC., JACK ABUHOFF, MARK SPELKER and others
NEWTON AC/DC FUND L.P. v. HECTOR DAO et al
as 3:2024cv00722
Plaintiff:
NEWTON AC/DC FUND L.P.
Defendant:
HECTOR DAO, FAROOQ HASSAN and JOHN DOE
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 77 Securities Fraud
KAO et al v. JOHNSON & JOHNSON et al
as 3:2024cv00482
Plaintiff:
JOHN KAO and ANDREY GYUROV
Defendant:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON, THIBAUT MONGON, PAUL RUH and others
KAO et al v. JOHNSON & JOHNSON et al
as 2:2024cv00482
Plaintiff:
JOHN KAO and ANDREY GYUROV
Defendant:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON, THIBAUT MONGON, PAUL RUH and others
CLEMENTE et al v. DOE et al
as 3:2024cv00314
Plaintiff:
KEVIN CLEMENTE and BARBARA CLEMENTE
Defendant:
JANE DOE, TRENDY DIGITAL CONSULTING, INC., MAEHAL ENTERPRISES, INC. and others
TURNER v. VESTBERG et al
as 3:2024cv00272
Plaintiff:
JANIS TURNER
Defendant:
HANS VESTBERG, MATTHEW ELLIS, CLARENCE OTIS, JR. and others
Not Yet Classified:
VERIZON COMMUNICATIONS INC. SHAREHOLDER DERIVATIVE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
TURNER v. VESTBERG et al
as 2:2024cv00272
Plaintiff:
JANIS TURNER
Defendant:
HANS VESTBERG, MATTHEW ELLIS, CLARENCE OTIS, JR. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
