Cases 31 - 40 of 857
MONACO et al v. SCHMIDT et al
as 1:2023cv21476
Plaintiff:
CHRISTOPHER MONACO, BRIAN SHARPE, GABRIEL PAOLETTI and others
Defendant:
CHARLES J. SCHMIDT, III, AMERICAN EXPRESS NATIONAL BANK, BRETT SCHMIDT and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Securities Violation
Clark v. Point Biopharma Global Inc. et al
as 1:2023cv01207
Plaintiff:
John Clark
Defendant:
Point Biopharma Global Inc., Allan Silber, Jonathan Ross Goodman and others
Turner v. Acer Therapeutics, Inc. et al
as 1:2023cv01185
Plaintiff:
Kevin Turner
Defendant:
Acer Therapeutics, Inc., Stephen J. Aselage, Jason Amello and others
Jones v. Acer Therapeutics Inc. et al
as 1:2023cv01186
Plaintiff:
Matthew Jones
Defendant:
Acer Therapeutics, Inc., Stephen J. Aselage, Jason Amello and others
Clark v. Intercept Pharmaceuticals, Inc. et al
as 1:2023cv01180
Plaintiff:
John Clark
Defendant:
Intercept Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Jerome Durso, Paolo Fundaro and others
Woods et al v. Bain et al
as 1:2023cv01158
Plaintiff:
Lori Woods and Makar Stozhyk
Defendant:
Adam Bain, Cipora Herman, Jonathan Jaffe and others
Nominal Defendant:
Opendoor Technologies, Inc.
McDaniels v. NextGen Healthcare, Inc. et al
as 1:2023cv01149
Plaintiff:
John McDaniels
Defendant:
NextGen Healthcare, Inc., Jeffrey H. Margolis, Craig A. Barbarosh and others
Marti et al v. Mahadevia et al
as 1:2023cv01133
Plaintiff:
Guillermo Marti and Felicia Marti JT Ten
Defendant:
Ankit Mahadevia, Satyavrat Shukla, Milind Deshpande and others
Nominal Defendant:
Spero Therapeutics, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 77 Securities Fraud
Smith v. Avid Technology, Inc. et al
as 1:2023cv01137
Plaintiff:
Nathan Smith
Defendant:
Avid Technology, Inc., John P. Wallace, Christian A. Asmar and others
Jones v. Avid Technology, Inc. et al
as 1:2023cv01139
Plaintiff:
Matthew Jones
Defendant:
Avid Technology, Inc., John P. Wallace, Christian A. Asmar and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
