Supplemental Security Income Cases filed in Pennsylvania
Cases 71 - 80 of 116
RSS Feed | View as table | Sort by last update
GILLESPIE v. ASTRUE We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2012cv06136
Plaintiff: JOHN D. GILLESPIE
Defendant: MICHAEL J. ASTRUE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
GABRYS v. ASTRUE We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2012cv06099
Plaintiff: JOHN J. GABRYS, JR.
Defendant: MICHAEL J. ASTRUE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
SCHANEWOLF v. ASTRUE
as 5:2012cv05643
Plaintiff: JOHN C. SCHANEWOLF
Defendant: MICHAEL J. ASTRUE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
WILSON v. ASTRUE We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2012cv05006
Plaintiff: JOHN CHRISTOPHER WILSON
Defendant: MICHAEL J. ASTRUE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
KEMP v. ASTRUE
as 5:2012cv04668
Plaintiff: JOHN M. KEMP
Defendant: MICHAEL J. ASTRUE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
BOSMAN v. ASTRUE We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2012cv04083
Plaintiff: JOHN A. BOSMAN
Defendant: MICHAEL J. ASTRUE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
ANDREWS v. ASTRUE We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2012cv01205
Plaintiff: JOHN L. ANDREWS
Defendant: MICHAEL J. ASTRUE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Updegraff v. Commissioner of Social Security We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2012cv00197
Plaintiff: John Nile Updegraff
Defendant: Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
MCGINNIS v. SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION
as 2:2011cv05957
Plaintiff: JOHN F. MCGINNIS, JR.
Defendant: SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
PASLEY v. ASTRUE
as 2:2011cv05895
Plaintiff: JOHN PASLEY
Defendant: MICHAEL J. ASTRUE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?