Cases 71 - 80 of 606
RICHBURG v. SAUL
as 2:2020cv01957
Plaintiff:
CHARLENE RICHBURG
Interested Party:
SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION
Defendant:
Commissioner ANDREW M. SAUL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
JENNINGS v. SAUL
as 2:2020cv01953
Plaintiff:
TARRELLE RONALD THOMAS and ANNETTE JENNINGS
Defendant:
Commissioner ANDREW M. SAUL and ANDREW M. SAUL
Interested Party:
SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205
MCADAMS v. BURWELL et al
as 2:2020cv01905
Defendant:
SYLVIA MATTHEWS BURWELL and NANCY A. BERRYHILL
Interested Party:
SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION
Plaintiff:
ALFRED D. MCADAMS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
GROTSKY v. SAUL
as 2:2020cv01875
Defendant:
ANDREW SAUL
Interested Party:
SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION
Plaintiff:
ALAN GROTSKY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
CHRISTOFFERSON et al v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
as 2:2020cv01497
Defendant:
COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
Interested Party:
SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION
Plaintiff:
LAWRENCE D. CHRISTOFFERSON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
ZORZETTO-KAMMEYER v. SAUL
as 5:2020cv01443
Defendant:
ANDREW SAUL
Interested Party:
SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION
Plaintiff:
ASHLEY ZORZETTO-KAMMEYER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
TUCKER v. SAUL
as 2:2020cv01366
Defendant:
ANDREW SAUL
Interested Party:
SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL ANTHONY TUCKER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
ROBINSON v. SAUL
as 2:2020cv01363
Interested Party:
SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION
Defendant:
ANDREW M. SAUL
Plaintiff:
SHAWN MAURICE ROBINSON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
NEGRON v. SAUL
as 2:2020cv01364
Plaintiff:
MARISSA NEGRON
Interested Party:
SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION
Defendant:
ANDREW M. SAUL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
BULLOCK v. SAUL
as 2:2020cv01299
Defendant:
ANDREW SAUL
Interested Party:
SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION
Plaintiff:
ALEXANDER RAYMOND BULLOCK
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
